SCO vs. OILD
SCO (ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil) and OILD (MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both exchange-traded funds - SCO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%), while OILD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCO returned -29.81%/yr vs -43.79%/yr for OILD. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SCO vs. OILD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCO having a -65.39% return and OILD slightly higher at -64.92%.
SCO
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -23.78%
- 6M
- -55.81%
- YTD
- -65.39%
- 1Y
- -58.66%
- 3Y*
- -29.81%
- 5Y*
- -39.67%
- 10Y*
- -40.39%
- ALL TIME*
- -26.09%
OILD
- 1D
- -3.75%
- 1M
- -31.76%
- 6M
- -47.49%
- YTD
- -64.92%
- 1Y
- -72.17%
- 3Y*
- -43.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -59.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.56M | $2.79M | $3.90M | |
| $131.70M | $126.01M | $253.57M |
SCO vs. OILD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | -65.39% | 15.90% | -19.00% | -12.41% | -62.59% | -0.47% |
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -64.92% | -41.67% | -14.58% | -19.58% | -90.32% | 3.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCO and OILD is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SCO and OILD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCO vs. OILD — Risk / Return Rank
SCO
OILD
SCO vs. OILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCO | OILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.78 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.95 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | -1.42 | +0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCO vs. OILD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum OILD drawdown of -98.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and OILD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCO | OILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -98.90% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.24% | -74.53% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.64% | -85.42% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.77% | -98.86% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.28% | -88.90% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.39% | 49.58% | -7.19% |
Volatility
SCO vs. OILD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) has a higher volatility of 23.27% compared to MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) at 19.24%. This indicates that SCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCO | OILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.27% | 19.24% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.24% | 50.43% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.66% | 63.51% | -3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.43% | 79.08% | -18.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.89% | 79.08% | -7.19% |
SCO vs. OILD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCO and OILD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SCO vs. OILD - Dividend Comparison
Neither SCO nor OILD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCO and OILD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCO has higher volatility (23.27%) compared to OILD (19.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCO dropped -99.80% vs OILD's -98.90%.
On 3-year performance, SCO leads with -29.81% vs -43.79% for OILD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, OILD has been the lower-risk option at 19.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCO has performed better with a -29.81% return vs -43.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCO and OILD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SCO and OILD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SCO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while OILD is Inverse Equities. SCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%), while OILD tracks Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and REX.
SCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.94 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCO and OILD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer