PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILD vs. BOIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OILD vs. BOIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILD achieves a -61.30% return, which is significantly lower than BOIL's -36.77% return.


OILD

1D
-3.52%
1M
4.33%
YTD
-61.30%
6M
-58.58%
1Y
-72.54%
3Y*
-48.14%
5Y*
10Y*

BOIL

1D
4.32%
1M
4.62%
YTD
-36.77%
6M
-62.98%
1Y
-74.31%
3Y*
-60.61%
5Y*
-64.63%
10Y*
-56.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILD vs. BOIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OILD
MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs
-61.30%-41.67%-14.58%-19.58%-90.32%5.20%
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
-36.77%-58.98%-60.75%-92.00%-31.85%-50.60%

Correlation

The correlation between OILD and BOIL is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OILD vs. BOIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILD
OILD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
OILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
OILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BOIL
BOIL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BOIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOIL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BOIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOIL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILD vs. BOIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OILDBOILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

0.90

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.92

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.56

-1.26

-0.30

OILD vs. BOIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILD Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the BOIL Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILD and BOIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OILDBOILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.19

-0.66

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

-0.61

-0.14

Drawdowns

OILD vs. BOIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILD drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, roughly equal to the maximum BOIL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILD and BOIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OILDBOILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.90%

-100.00%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.40%

-80.85%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.53%

-96.86%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.74%

-100.00%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.64%

-93.59%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.59%

59.20%

-12.61%

Volatility

OILD vs. BOIL - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) have volatilities of 24.24% and 23.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OILDBOILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.24%

23.95%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.55%

107.61%

-59.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.12%

113.64%

-52.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.39%

118.89%

-39.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.39%

101.81%

-22.42%

OILD vs. BOIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BOIL's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

OILD vs. BOIL - Dividend Comparison

Neither OILD nor BOIL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


OILD and BOIL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILD has higher volatility (24.24%) compared to BOIL (23.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILD dropped -98.90% vs BOIL's -100.00%.

On 3-year performance, OILD leads with -48.14% vs -60.61% for BOIL. On fees, OILD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BOIL has been the lower-risk option at 23.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, OILD has performed better with a -48.14% return vs -60.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BOIL.

OILD and BOIL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

OILD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BOIL is Leveraged Commodities. OILD tracks Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%), while BOIL tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. They also come from different issuers: REX and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OILD and 1.31% for BOIL.

BOIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OILD and BOIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer