SCO vs. AGQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ).
SCO and AGQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008. AGQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Silver (200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. Both SCO and AGQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SCO vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCO vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | -55.18% | 15.90% | -19.00% | -12.41% | -62.59% | -72.62% | -4.20% | -58.50% | 19.22% | -22.40% |
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -23.34% | 360.71% | 23.92% | -15.09% | -7.89% | -32.25% | 62.02% | 20.02% | -22.10% | 5.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCO achieves a -55.18% return, which is significantly lower than AGQ's -23.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SCO has underperformed AGQ with an annualized return of -39.82%, while AGQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.25% annualized return.
SCO
- 1D
- 5.65%
- 1M
- -31.91%
- YTD
- -55.18%
- 6M
- -50.11%
- 1Y
- -47.55%
- 3Y*
- -29.63%
- 5Y*
- -41.92%
- 10Y*
- -39.82%
AGQ
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -32.70%
- YTD
- -23.34%
- 6M
- 51.96%
- 1Y
- 163.54%
- 3Y*
- 56.15%
- 5Y*
- 22.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCO vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCO vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank
SCO
AGQ
SCO vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCO | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | 1.40 | -2.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | 2.00 | -3.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.35 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 2.07 | -2.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.71 | 5.57 | -7.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCO | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | 1.40 | -2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.71 | 0.31 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.55 | 0.22 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.36 | 0.09 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCO and AGQ is -0.23. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
SCO vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither SCO nor AGQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SCO vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, roughly equal to the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and AGQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCO | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.74% | -98.16% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.46% | -76.21% | +9.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.53% | -76.21% | -18.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.48% | -76.25% | -23.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.70% | -83.72% | -15.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.03% | -79.83% | -5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.84% | 28.27% | -0.43% |
Volatility
SCO vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) is 24.45%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 34.37%. This indicates that SCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCO | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.45% | 34.37% | -9.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.35% | 132.42% | -92.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.03% | 117.90% | -60.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.08% | 73.01% | -13.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.93% | 64.67% | +7.26% |