SCJ vs. GSJY
SCJ (iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF) and GSJY (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - SCJ tracks the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index while GSJY tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCJ returned 7.55%/yr vs 9.28%/yr for GSJY. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSJY.
Performance
SCJ vs. GSJY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCJ achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than GSJY's 13.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SCJ has underperformed GSJY with an annualized return of 7.55%, while GSJY has yielded a comparatively higher 9.28% annualized return.
SCJ
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 30.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
GSJY
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
SCJ vs. GSJY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 14.35% | 29.58% | 3.41% | 13.22% | -12.75% | -2.95% | 7.46% | 16.16% | -17.17% | 31.61% |
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 13.29% | 26.22% | 8.89% | 19.18% | -16.15% | 0.41% | 13.81% | 18.29% | -11.56% | 25.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCJ and GSJY is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2016 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SCJ and GSJY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCJ vs. GSJY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCJ
GSJY
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
SCJ
GSJY
Consumer Cyclical
SCJ
GSJY
Technology
SCJ
GSJY
Basic Materials
SCJ
GSJY
Financial Services
SCJ
GSJY
Real Estate
SCJ
GSJY
Consumer Defensive
SCJ
GSJY
Healthcare
SCJ
GSJY
Communication Services
SCJ
GSJY
Utilities
SCJ
GSJY
Energy
SCJ
GSJY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCJ vs. GSJY — Risk / Return Rank
SCJ
GSJY
SCJ vs. GSJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCJ | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 1.54 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.67 | 2.24 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.12 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 7.09 | +1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCJ | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.54 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.49 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.55 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.54 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
SCJ vs. GSJY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCJ drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, which is greater than GSJY's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJ and GSJY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCJ | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.52% | -32.53% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -14.08% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.43% | -14.96% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.25% | -32.53% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.87% | -32.53% | -6.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -2.62% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.38% | -7.58% | -2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 4.21% | -0.62% |
Volatility
SCJ vs. GSJY - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) have volatilities of 4.03% and 4.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCJ | GSJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 4.21% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.13% | 15.17% | -2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 19.48% | -3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.81% | 18.07% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 17.04% | -0.75% |
SCJ vs. GSJY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GSJY's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCJ vs. GSJY - Dividend Comparison
SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than GSJY's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSJY Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF | 1.75% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 1.73% | 1.22% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 1.70% | 2.09% | 0.00% |
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 2.75% | 3.14% | 1.79% | 1.99% | 1.18% | 1.87% | 0.89% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.45% | 2.73% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCJ and GSJY have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSJY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to SCJ (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCJ dropped -43.52% vs GSJY's -32.53%.
On 10-year performance, GSJY leads with 9.28% vs 7.55% for SCJ. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SCJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GSJY has performed better with a 9.28% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SCJ.
SCJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 1.75% for GSJY.
SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, while GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SCJ and 0.25% for GSJY.
SCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCJ and GSJY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer