PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCJ vs. JPXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCJ vs. JPXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCJ achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than JPXN's 15.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SCJ has underperformed JPXN with an annualized return of 7.55%, while JPXN has yielded a comparatively higher 9.18% annualized return.


SCJ

1D
0.36%
1M
5.04%
YTD
14.35%
6M
16.37%
1Y
30.15%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
7.55%

JPXN

1D
0.13%
1M
5.12%
YTD
15.72%
6M
17.28%
1Y
30.49%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
9.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCJ vs. JPXN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
14.35%29.58%3.41%13.22%-12.75%-2.95%7.46%16.16%-17.17%31.61%
JPXN
iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF
15.72%26.03%6.48%19.69%-16.29%0.16%15.12%19.40%-14.87%24.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SCJ and JPXN is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.84

The correlation between SCJ and JPXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCJ vs. JPXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCJ
JPXN

Industrials

28.9%
28.3%

Consumer Cyclical

14.6%
11.3%

Technology

11.2%
17.3%

Basic Materials

10.1%
5.0%

Financial Services

9.7%
13.7%

Real Estate

8.4%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
4.8%

Healthcare

4.4%
6.2%

Communication Services

2.9%
7.8%

Utilities

2.1%
1.6%

Energy

0.8%
1.4%

Industrials

SCJ
28.9%
JPXN
28.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SCJ
14.6%
JPXN
11.3%

Technology

SCJ
11.2%
JPXN
17.3%

Basic Materials

SCJ
10.1%
JPXN
5.0%

Financial Services

SCJ
9.7%
JPXN
13.7%

Real Estate

SCJ
8.4%
JPXN
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SCJ
6.8%
JPXN
4.8%

Healthcare

SCJ
4.4%
JPXN
6.2%

Communication Services

SCJ
2.9%
JPXN
7.8%

Utilities

SCJ
2.1%
JPXN
1.6%

Energy

SCJ
0.8%
JPXN
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCJ vs. JPXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCJ
SCJ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

JPXN
JPXN Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCJ vs. JPXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCJJPXNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

1.63

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

2.37

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.34

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.42

8.14

+0.28

SCJ vs. JPXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the JPXN Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCJ and JPXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCJJPXNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.63

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.49

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.54

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.27

+0.04

Drawdowns

SCJ vs. JPXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCJ drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, smaller than the maximum JPXN drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJ and JPXN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCJJPXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.52%

-55.54%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

-13.11%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.43%

-13.95%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.25%

-33.21%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

-33.21%

-5.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-0.93%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-15.06%

+4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

3.76%

-0.17%

Volatility

SCJ vs. JPXN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) is 4.03%, while iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that SCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCJJPXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

4.31%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.13%

14.69%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

18.79%

-2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

17.70%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

17.06%

-0.77%

SCJ vs. JPXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than JPXN's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCJ vs. JPXN - Dividend Comparison

SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than JPXN's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPXN
iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF
2.72%3.14%2.29%2.57%1.47%2.63%1.27%1.92%1.60%1.50%2.07%1.32%
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
2.75%3.14%1.79%1.99%1.18%1.87%0.89%1.85%1.44%1.45%2.73%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCJ and JPXN have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPXN has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to SCJ (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCJ dropped -43.52% vs JPXN's -55.54%.

On 10-year performance, JPXN leads with 9.18% vs 7.55% for SCJ. On fees, JPXN is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, SCJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JPXN has performed better with a 9.18% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPXN is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SCJ.

SCJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.72% for JPXN.

SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, while JPXN tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SCJ and 0.48% for JPXN.

SCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCJ and JPXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer