SCJ vs. JPXN
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN).
SCJ and JPXN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCJ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007. JPXN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPX-Nikkei Index 400. It was launched on Oct 26, 2001. Both SCJ and JPXN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCJ or JPXN.
Correlation
The correlation between SCJ and JPXN is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCJ vs. JPXN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SCJ:
0.37
JPXN:
0.52
SCJ:
0.61
JPXN:
0.81
SCJ:
1.07
JPXN:
1.10
SCJ:
0.33
JPXN:
0.74
SCJ:
1.36
JPXN:
2.25
SCJ:
4.19%
JPXN:
4.04%
SCJ:
15.42%
JPXN:
17.39%
SCJ:
-43.52%
JPXN:
-54.98%
SCJ:
-12.34%
JPXN:
-8.36%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCJ achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than JPXN's 5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SCJ has underperformed JPXN with an annualized return of 5.27%, while JPXN has yielded a comparatively higher 5.63% annualized return.
SCJ
1.61%
-1.06%
2.77%
5.41%
0.79%
5.27%
JPXN
5.78%
-0.81%
0.90%
9.59%
3.91%
5.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCJ vs. JPXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than JPXN's 0.48% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCJ vs. JPXN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCJ vs. JPXN - Dividend Comparison
SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, which matches JPXN's 2.30% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.99% | 1.18% | 1.87% | 0.89% | 4.46% | 1.44% | 1.45% | 2.73% | 1.53% | 2.31% | 1.85% |
iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF | 2.30% | 2.58% | 1.47% | 2.63% | 1.27% | 1.92% | 1.60% | 1.50% | 2.07% | 1.32% | 1.42% | 1.18% |
Drawdowns
SCJ vs. JPXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCJ drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, smaller than the maximum JPXN drawdown of -54.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJ and JPXN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCJ vs. JPXN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) is 4.27%, while iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that SCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.