SCJ vs. BBJP
SCJ (iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF) and BBJP (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - SCJ tracks the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index while BBJP tracks the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCJ returned 7.36%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for BBJP. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BBJP.
Performance
SCJ vs. BBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCJ achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than BBJP's 15.37% return.
SCJ
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 30.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
BBJP
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 15.37%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 32.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
SCJ vs. BBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 14.35% | 29.58% | 3.41% | 13.22% | -12.75% | -2.95% | 7.46% | 16.16% | -17.72% |
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 15.37% | 26.55% | 7.47% | 20.65% | -17.24% | 1.21% | 15.42% | 18.85% | -13.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCJ and BBJP is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SCJ and BBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCJ vs. BBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCJ
BBJP
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
SCJ
BBJP
Consumer Cyclical
SCJ
BBJP
Technology
SCJ
BBJP
Basic Materials
SCJ
BBJP
Financial Services
SCJ
BBJP
Real Estate
SCJ
BBJP
Consumer Defensive
SCJ
BBJP
Healthcare
SCJ
BBJP
Communication Services
SCJ
BBJP
Utilities
SCJ
BBJP
Energy
SCJ
BBJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCJ vs. BBJP — Risk / Return Rank
SCJ
BBJP
SCJ vs. BBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCJ | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.31 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.37 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 7.95 | +0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCJ | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.66 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.49 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.45 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
SCJ vs. BBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCJ drawdown since its inception was -43.52%, which is greater than BBJP's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCJ and BBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCJ | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.52% | -32.66% | -10.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -13.60% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.43% | -14.49% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.25% | -32.66% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -0.85% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.38% | -8.53% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 4.04% | -0.45% |
Volatility
SCJ vs. BBJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) is 4.03%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that SCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCJ | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 4.26% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.13% | 14.98% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 19.44% | -3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.81% | 18.15% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 18.29% | -2.00% |
SCJ vs. BBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BBJP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCJ vs. BBJP - Dividend Comparison
SCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than BBJP's 4.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 4.65% | 5.37% | 2.80% | 3.05% | 1.52% | 2.89% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 2.75% | 3.14% | 1.79% | 1.99% | 1.18% | 1.87% | 0.89% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.45% | 2.73% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCJ and BBJP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBJP has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to SCJ (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCJ dropped -43.52% vs BBJP's -32.66%.
On 5-year performance, BBJP leads with 8.92% vs 7.36% for SCJ. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SCJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBJP has performed better with a 8.92% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SCJ.
BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 2.75% for SCJ.
SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index, while BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SCJ and 0.19% for BBJP.
SCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCJ and BBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer