PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHZ vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHZ vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHZ achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 15.56% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 1.52%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.


SCHZ

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.15%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
1.52%

SCHF

1D
-0.86%
1M
5.91%
YTD
15.56%
6M
18.62%
1Y
32.67%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHZ vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.30%7.24%1.26%5.60%-13.17%-1.72%7.46%8.65%-0.26%3.50%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
15.56%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHZ and SCHF is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2011

-0.01

The correlation between SCHZ and SCHF shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHZ vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHZ
SCHF

Financial Services

8.3%
20.6%

Technology

3.0%
15.7%

Healthcare

2.3%
6.5%

Utilities

2.1%
1.7%

Communication Services

2.1%
2.3%

Industrials

1.7%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
5.7%

Energy

1.3%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
4.9%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.7%

Basic Materials

0.4%
6.5%

Financial Services

SCHZ
8.3%
SCHF
20.6%

Technology

SCHZ
3.0%
SCHF
15.7%

Healthcare

SCHZ
2.3%
SCHF
6.5%

Utilities

SCHZ
2.1%
SCHF
1.7%

Communication Services

SCHZ
2.1%
SCHF
2.3%

Industrials

SCHZ
1.7%
SCHF
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHZ
1.4%
SCHF
5.7%

Energy

SCHZ
1.3%
SCHF
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCHZ
1.1%
SCHF
4.9%

Real Estate

SCHZ
0.8%
SCHF
1.7%

Basic Materials

SCHZ
0.4%
SCHF
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHZ vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHZ
SCHZ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SCHZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHZ vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHZSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.86

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

11.11

-5.24

SCHZ vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHZ and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHZSCHFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.09

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.60

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.60

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.44

+0.01

Drawdowns

SCHZ vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHZ drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHZ and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHZSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-34.87%

+16.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-11.48%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.18%

-13.41%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.01%

-29.14%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.74%

-34.87%

+16.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-0.86%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-7.38%

+3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

2.95%

-2.07%

Volatility

SCHZ vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) is 1.24%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that SCHZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHZSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

5.66%

-4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

13.34%

-10.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

15.74%

-11.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

16.39%

-10.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.41%

17.18%

-11.77%

SCHZ vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHZ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHZ vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than SCHF's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.96%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.12%4.05%3.96%3.28%2.63%2.16%2.43%2.79%2.56%2.40%2.24%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHZ and SCHF have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to SCHZ (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHZ dropped -18.74% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.27% vs 1.52% for SCHZ. On fees, SCHZ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHZ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 2.96% for SCHF.

SCHZ is categorized as Total Bond Market, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SCHZ tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHZ and 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHZ and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer