SCHZ vs. SCHA
SCHZ (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHZ is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while SCHA is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ returned 1.52%/yr vs 11.13%/yr for SCHA. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. SCHZ charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
SCHZ vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHZ achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 19.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 1.52%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.13% annualized return.
SCHZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
SCHZ vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.30% | 7.24% | 1.26% | 5.60% | -13.17% | -1.72% | 7.46% | 8.65% | -0.26% | 3.50% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 19.79% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHZ and SCHA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2011 | -0.05 |
The correlation between SCHZ and SCHA shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHZ vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHZ
SCHA
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
SCHZ
SCHA
Technology
SCHZ
SCHA
Healthcare
SCHZ
SCHA
Utilities
SCHZ
SCHA
Communication Services
SCHZ
SCHA
Industrials
SCHZ
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
SCHZ
SCHA
Energy
SCHZ
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
SCHZ
SCHA
Real Estate
SCHZ
SCHA
Basic Materials
SCHZ
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHZ vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
SCHZ
SCHA
SCHZ vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHZ | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.38 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 4.26 | -2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 15.66 | -9.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHZ | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.25 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.33 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.49 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.57 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SCHZ vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHZ drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHZ and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHZ | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -42.41% | +23.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.70% | -9.50% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.18% | -27.29% | +21.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.01% | -30.79% | +12.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.74% | -42.41% | +23.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -0.58% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -7.58% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 2.58% | -1.70% |
Volatility
SCHZ vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) is 1.24%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that SCHZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHZ | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 5.08% | -3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 12.83% | -10.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 18.01% | -14.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.08% | 21.93% | -15.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 22.71% | -17.30% |
SCHZ vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHZ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHZ vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than SCHA's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.05% | 3.96% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHZ and SCHA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHA has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to SCHZ (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHZ dropped -18.74% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 11.13% vs 1.52% for SCHZ. On fees, SCHZ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 11.13% return vs 1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHZ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 1.00% for SCHA.
SCHZ is categorized as Total Bond Market, while SCHA is Small Cap Growth Equities. SCHZ tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHZ and 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHZ and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer