SCHZ vs. BAGSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHZ (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and BAGSX (Baird Aggregate Bond Fund) are both funds - SCHZ is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while BAGSX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Baird. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ returned 1.52%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for BAGSX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHZ charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BAGSX.

Performance

SCHZ vs. BAGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with SCHZ at 0.30% and BAGSX at 0.30%. Over the past 10 years, SCHZ has underperformed BAGSX with an annualized return of 1.52%, while BAGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.74% annualized return.

SCHZ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 0.15%
• 1Y: 5.16%
• 3Y*: 3.94%
• 5Y*: 0.07%
• 10Y*: 1.52%

BAGSX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: 4.25%
• 5Y*: 0.19%
• 10Y*: 1.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHZ vs. BAGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.30%	7.24%	1.26%	5.60%	-13.17%	-1.72%	7.46%	8.65%	-0.26%	3.50%
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund	0.30%	7.11%	1.63%	6.12%	-13.52%	-1.74%	8.42%	9.17%	-0.55%	3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHZ and BAGSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2011	0.89

The correlation between SCHZ and BAGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCHZ vs. BAGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHZ

SCHZ Risk / Return Rank: 37
SCHZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SCHZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SCHZ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SCHZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
SCHZ Martin Ratio Rank: 37

BAGSX

BAGSX Risk / Return Rank: 24
BAGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BAGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BAGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BAGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BAGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHZ vs. BAGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHZ	BAGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.41	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.09	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.26	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	1.87	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.87	5.53	+0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHZ vs. BAGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the BAGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHZ and BAGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHZ	BAGSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	1.41	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	0.03	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.36	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.92	-0.48

Drawdowns

SCHZ vs. BAGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHZ drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, roughly equal to the maximum BAGSX drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHZ and BAGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHZ	BAGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.74%	-18.97%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.70%	-2.84%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.18%	-6.17%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.01%	-18.84%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.74%	-18.97%	+0.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-1.54%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.68%	-2.52%	-1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.96%	-0.08%

Volatility

SCHZ vs. BAGSX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) have volatilities of 1.24% and 1.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHZ	BAGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	1.29%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.67%	2.68%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.79%	3.78%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.08%	5.93%	+0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.41%	4.89%	+0.52%

SCHZ vs. BAGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHZ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BAGSX's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHZ vs. BAGSX - Dividend Comparison

SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than BAGSX's 3.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund	3.80%	3.69%	3.62%	3.10%	2.33%	1.68%	3.02%	2.41%	2.53%	2.21%	1.96%	2.14%
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.12%	4.05%	3.96%	3.28%	2.63%	2.16%	2.43%	2.79%	2.56%	2.40%	2.24%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHZ and BAGSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, SCHZ and BAGSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCHZ or BAGSX?

BAGSX has higher volatility (1.29%) compared to SCHZ (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHZ dropped -18.74% vs BAGSX's -18.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.