SCHX vs. XLF

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHX returned 15.35%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for XLF. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.

Performance

SCHX vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -2.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has outperformed XLF with an annualized return of 15.35%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.33% annualized return.

SCHX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -0.68%
• YTD: 8.86%
• 6M: 9.10%
• 1Y: 25.11%
• 3Y*: 20.84%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: 15.35%

XLF

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 4.00%
• YTD: -2.11%
• 6M: -2.09%
• 1Y: 8.41%
• 3Y*: 18.86%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: 13.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHX vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF	8.86%	17.46%	24.88%	26.84%	-19.41%	26.81%	20.81%	31.22%	-4.66%	21.95%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	-2.11%	14.90%	30.56%	12.03%	-10.59%	34.80%	-1.74%	31.88%	-13.06%	22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHX and XLF is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009	0.79

The correlation between SCHX and XLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHX vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHX	XLF
Technology	42.9%	1.8%
Communication Services	11.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	-
Financial Services	9.0%	98.0%
Healthcare	8.5%	-
Industrials	6.4%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	-
Energy	3.0%	-
Utilities	1.3%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

SCHX vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHX

SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 66
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

XLF

XLF Risk / Return Rank: 15
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 15
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHX vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHX	XLF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	0.42	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	0.67	+1.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.08	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	0.42	+2.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.65	1.08	+10.57

SCHX vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHX and XLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHX vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and XLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHX	XLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.33%	-82.69%	+48.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	-14.79%	+5.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.04%	-15.54%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.41%	-25.81%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.33%	-42.86%	+8.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.37%	-4.94%	+2.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.96%	-20.01%	+16.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	5.76%	-3.72%

Volatility

SCHX vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.23%. This indicates that SCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHX	XLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	4.23%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.71%	11.26%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	14.69%	-2.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.19%	18.66%	-1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	22.17%	-4.00%

SCHX vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHX vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than XLF's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF	1.02%	1.09%	1.22%	1.39%	1.64%	1.22%	1.64%	1.82%	2.02%	1.70%	1.92%	2.04%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.49%	1.31%	1.42%	1.71%	2.04%	1.63%	2.03%	1.87%	2.08%	1.48%	21.10%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHX and XLF in my portfolio?

SCHX and XLF have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHX or XLF?

SCHX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to XLF (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs XLF's -82.69%.

Which ETF is better, SCHX or XLF?

On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.35% vs 13.33% for XLF. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHX or XLF?

Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 13.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHX or XLF?

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHX or XLF?

XLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.

What is the main difference between SCHX and XLF?

SCHX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLF is Financials Equities. SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.08% for XLF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.