SCHX vs. XLC
SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while XLC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHX returned 12.76%/yr vs 8.03%/yr for XLC. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLC.
Performance
SCHX vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly higher than XLC's -4.85% return.
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 25.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
XLC
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.86% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -9.10% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -4.85% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHX and XLC is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SCHX and XLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHX vs. XLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHX
XLC
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SCHX
XLC
Communication Services
SCHX
XLC
Consumer Cyclical
SCHX
XLC
-
Financial Services
SCHX
XLC
-
Healthcare
SCHX
XLC
-
Industrials
SCHX
XLC
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHX
XLC
-
Energy
SCHX
XLC
-
Utilities
SCHX
XLC
-
Basic Materials
SCHX
XLC
-
Real Estate
SCHX
XLC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHX vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank
SCHX
XLC
SCHX vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHX | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.12 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 0.86 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.65 | 2.73 | +8.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHX vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum XLC drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and XLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHX | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -46.65% | +12.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -10.57% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -17.97% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -46.65% | +21.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -6.72% | +4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -10.58% | +6.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 3.33% | -1.29% |
Volatility
SCHX vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) at 3.57%. This indicates that SCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHX | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 3.57% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 9.65% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 13.28% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 20.68% | -3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 22.17% | -4.00% |
SCHX vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHX vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than XLC's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.25% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHX and XLC have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to XLC (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs XLC's -46.65%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 12.76% vs 8.03% for XLC. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.
XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.
SCHX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLC is Communications Equities. SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.13% for XLC.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHX and XLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer