SCHX vs. SPTM
SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHX returned 15.08%/yr vs 14.91%/yr for SPTM. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHX vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 8.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHX having a 15.08% annualized return and SPTM not far behind at 14.91%.
SCHX
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 25.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
SPTM
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 8.71%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 25.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
SCHX vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.26% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 8.71% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 28.58% | 17.94% | 31.34% | -5.30% | 21.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHX and SPTM is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SCHX and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHX vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHX
SPTM
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHX
SPTM
Communication Services
SCHX
SPTM
Financial Services
SCHX
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
SCHX
SPTM
Industrials
SCHX
SPTM
Healthcare
SCHX
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
SCHX
SPTM
Energy
SCHX
SPTM
Utilities
SCHX
SPTM
Real Estate
SCHX
SPTM
Basic Materials
SCHX
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHX vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
SCHX
SPTM
SCHX vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHX | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 2.99 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 13.86 | -1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHX | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.13 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.77 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.45 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
SCHX vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHX | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -54.80% | +20.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -8.68% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -18.87% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -24.14% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | -34.66% | +0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -2.80% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -9.05% | +5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.87% | +0.12% |
Volatility
SCHX vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 3.85% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHX | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 3.72% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 9.32% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 12.16% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 16.90% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 18.05% | +0.11% |
SCHX vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHX and SPTM have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHX vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SPTM's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SCHX and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to SPTM (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 15.08% vs 14.91% for SPTM. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 15.08% return vs 14.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX and SPTM have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 1.03% for SCHX.
SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHX and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer