SCHV vs. RSPF

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and RSPF (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while RSPF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHV returned 12.25%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for RSPF. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPF.

Performance

SCHV vs. RSPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly higher than RSPF's -0.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHV having a 12.25% annualized return and RSPF not far ahead at 12.47%.

SCHV

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: 4.17%
• YTD: 18.75%
• 6M: 17.40%
• 1Y: 30.47%
• 3Y*: 19.36%
• 5Y*: 11.33%
• 10Y*: 12.25%

RSPF

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 2.13%
• YTD: -0.87%
• 6M: -2.50%
• 1Y: 4.81%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 6.97%
• 10Y*: 12.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHV vs. RSPF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	18.75%	16.02%	14.13%	8.93%	-7.65%	25.58%	2.64%	25.92%	-7.30%	16.56%
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	-0.87%	10.23%	25.75%	6.43%	-10.64%	36.36%	5.49%	31.53%	-15.81%	21.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHV and RSPF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.86

The correlation between SCHV and RSPF shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHV vs. RSPF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHV	RSPF
Technology	22.5%	6.1%
Financial Services	18.6%	92.6%
Industrials	13.6%	1.3%
Healthcare	10.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	-
Energy	6.4%	-
Utilities	4.2%	-
Real Estate	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.7%	-
Communication Services	2.4%	-

Return for Risk

SCHV vs. RSPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 90
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

RSPF

RSPF Risk / Return Rank: 13
RSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
RSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
RSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
RSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHV vs. RSPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHV	RSPF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	0.32	+2.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.87	0.54	+3.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.07	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.48	0.34	+4.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.98	0.94	+17.04

SCHV vs. RSPF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHV Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the RSPF Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHV and RSPF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHV vs. RSPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, smaller than the maximum RSPF drawdown of -81.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and RSPF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHV	RSPF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-81.32%	+44.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	-14.13%	+7.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.26%	-18.26%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.78%	-27.68%	+7.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.08%	-44.80%	+7.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.74%	+3.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-18.99%	+15.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	5.15%	-3.45%

Volatility

SCHV vs. RSPF - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHV	RSPF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	4.14%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.82%	11.43%	-2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	15.09%	-3.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.55%	19.76%	-5.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	22.86%	-5.92%

SCHV vs. RSPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPF's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHV vs. RSPF - Dividend Comparison

SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than RSPF's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	1.63%	1.55%	1.65%	2.16%	1.95%	1.56%	2.24%	1.85%	2.51%	1.28%	37.55%	2.17%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.75%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHV and RSPF in my portfolio?

SCHV and RSPF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHV or RSPF?

SCHV has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to RSPF (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs RSPF's -81.32%.

Which ETF is better, SCHV or RSPF?

On 10-year performance, RSPF leads with 12.47% vs 12.25% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, RSPF has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHV or RSPF?

Over the 10-year period, RSPF has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 12.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHV or RSPF?

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHV or RSPF?

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.63% for RSPF.

What is the main difference between SCHV and RSPF?

SCHV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RSPF is Financials Equities. SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while RSPF tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.40% for RSPF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.