RSPF vs. ^GSPC

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSPF (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, RSPF returned 12.64%/yr vs 13.26%/yr for ^GSPC. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.

Performance

RSPF vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPF achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPF having a 12.64% annualized return and ^GSPC not far ahead at 13.26%.

RSPF

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 2.81%
• 6M: 8.05%
• YTD: 7.16%
• 1Y: 13.09%
• 3Y*: 17.38%
• 5Y*: 9.06%
• 10Y*: 12.64%
• ALL TIME*: 6.71%

^GSPC

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.09%
• 6M: 7.94%
• YTD: 9.41%
• 1Y: 20.07%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 11.25%
• 10Y*: 13.26%
• ALL TIME*: 8.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
^GSPC S&P 500 Index	$37.98T	$37.61T	$41.48T
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	$1.52M	$1.88M	$1.39M

RSPF vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	7.16%	10.23%	25.75%	6.43%	-10.64%	36.36%	5.49%	31.53%	-15.81%	21.57%
^GSPC S&P 500 Index	9.41%	16.39%	23.31%	24.23%	-19.44%	26.89%	16.26%	28.88%	-6.24%	19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPF and ^GSPC is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006	0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between RSPF and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

RSPF vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPF

RSPF Risk / Return Rank: 28
RSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
RSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
RSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 28
RSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
RSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 27

^GSPC

^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 68
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPF vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPF	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	1.42	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	1.98	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.25	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	2.00	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.17	8.49	-6.32

RSPF vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPF Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPF and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPF vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPF drawdown since its inception was -81.32%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPF and ^GSPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPF	^GSPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.32%	-56.78%	-24.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.13%	-9.10%	-5.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.26%	-18.90%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.68%	-25.43%	-2.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.80%	-33.92%	-10.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.74%	-1.58%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.90%	-10.70%	-8.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.13%	2.14%	+2.99%

Volatility

RSPF vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.51%. This indicates that RSPF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPF	^GSPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	3.51%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.54%	10.11%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.40%	12.87%	+2.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.65%	17.01%	+2.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.85%	18.07%	+4.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPF and ^GSPC in my portfolio?

RSPF and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPF or ^GSPC?

RSPF has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to ^GSPC (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPF dropped -81.32% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.