SCHV vs. PVAL
SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. SCHV is passively managed, while PVAL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHV returned 10.33%/yr vs 15.91%/yr for PVAL. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PVAL.
Performance
SCHV vs. PVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than PVAL's 11.24% return.
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 15.31%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
PVAL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 31.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV vs. PVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 14.24% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 8.25% |
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 11.24% | 24.13% | 19.30% | 18.41% | -2.61% | 11.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHV and PVAL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SCHV and PVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHV vs. PVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHV
PVAL
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
SCHV
PVAL
Technology
SCHV
PVAL
Industrials
SCHV
PVAL
Healthcare
SCHV
PVAL
Consumer Defensive
SCHV
PVAL
Energy
SCHV
PVAL
Consumer Cyclical
SCHV
PVAL
Utilities
SCHV
PVAL
Real Estate
SCHV
PVAL
Basic Materials
SCHV
PVAL
Communication Services
SCHV
PVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHV vs. PVAL — Risk / Return Rank
SCHV
PVAL
SCHV vs. PVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHV | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.52 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 4.31 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.87 | 16.44 | -0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHV | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 2.86 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 1.05 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.06 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
SCHV vs. PVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than PVAL's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and PVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHV | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -16.64% | -20.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -7.22% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | -15.42% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.78% | -16.64% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -1.60% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -3.01% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.89% | -0.20% |
Volatility
SCHV vs. PVAL - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) at 2.87%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHV | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 2.87% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 8.41% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 10.91% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 15.29% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 15.24% | +1.71% |
SCHV vs. PVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PVAL's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHV vs. PVAL - Dividend Comparison
SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than PVAL's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 0.98% | 1.00% | 1.34% | 1.33% | 0.59% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SCHV and PVAL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHV has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to PVAL (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs PVAL's -16.64%.
On 5-year performance, PVAL leads with 15.91% vs 10.33% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 15.91% return vs 10.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PVAL.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.98% for PVAL.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.55% for PVAL.
PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHV and PVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer