SCHV vs. PMAY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and PMAY (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while PMAY is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHV returned 10.40%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for PMAY. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PMAY.

Performance

SCHV vs. PMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly higher than PMAY's 4.47% return.

SCHV

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 5.65%
• YTD: 15.39%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 28.49%
• 3Y*: 18.86%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: 11.50%

PMAY

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 4.47%
• 6M: 5.26%
• 1Y: 11.51%
• 3Y*: 12.31%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHV vs. PMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	15.39%	16.02%	14.13%	8.93%	-7.65%	25.58%	28.11%
PMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May	4.47%	10.26%	14.08%	12.05%	-8.08%	7.80%	11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHV and PMAY is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020	0.75

The correlation between SCHV and PMAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHV vs. PMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHV	PMAY
Financial Services	19.6%	11.9%
Technology	18.2%	36.2%
Industrials	14.0%	8.1%
Healthcare	11.3%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.8%	4.9%
Energy	7.2%	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	10.1%
Utilities	4.6%	2.3%
Real Estate	4.1%	1.9%
Basic Materials	2.8%	1.8%
Communication Services	2.5%	10.9%

Return for Risk

SCHV vs. PMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 81
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 82

PMAY

PMAY Risk / Return Rank: 94
PMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
PMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHV vs. PMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHV	PMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	3.07	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.84	4.97	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.71	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	7.34	-3.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.96	41.09	-24.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHV vs. PMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHV Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the PMAY Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHV and PMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHV	PMAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	3.07	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.84	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	1.00	-0.29

Drawdowns

SCHV vs. PMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than PMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and PMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHV	PMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-13.05%	-24.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	-1.58%	-5.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.26%	-9.43%	-5.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.78%	-13.05%	-6.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.23%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-2.11%	-1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	0.28%	+1.41%

Volatility

SCHV vs. PMAY - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) at 1.24%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHV	PMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	1.24%	+1.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.13%	2.79%	+5.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.63%	3.77%	+6.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.51%	8.65%	+5.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	8.40%	+8.54%

SCHV vs. PMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PMAY's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHV vs. PMAY - Dividend Comparison

SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, while PMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PMAY Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.76%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHV and PMAY in my portfolio?

SCHV and PMAY have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHV or PMAY?

SCHV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to PMAY (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs PMAY's -13.05%.

Which ETF is better, SCHV or PMAY?

On 5-year performance, SCHV leads with 10.40% vs 7.21% for PMAY. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PMAY has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHV or PMAY?

Over the 5-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHV or PMAY?

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHV or PMAY?

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.00% for PMAY.

What is the main difference between SCHV and PMAY?

SCHV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while PMAY is Defined Outcome. SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while PMAY tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.79% for PMAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.