PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMAY vs. EAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PMAY vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PMAY vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PMAY
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May
0.88%10.26%14.08%12.05%-8.08%5.93%
EAPR
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April
0.61%14.80%2.86%8.19%-5.01%-2.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAY achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than EAPR's 0.61% return.


PMAY

1D
1.47%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.88%
6M
2.69%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*

EAPR

1D
-0.97%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
0.61%
6M
2.49%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PMAY vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PMAY vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMAY
PMAY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EAPR
EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMAY vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMAYEAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

1.64

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

2.39

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.46

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.77

-0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.19

13.21

-4.02

PMAY vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMAY and EAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMAYEAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.64

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.36

+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between PMAY and EAPR is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PMAY vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMAY nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PMAY vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.05%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAY and EAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PMAYEAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.05%

-17.65%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-6.99%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.97%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-4.18%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

0.94%

+0.35%

Volatility

PMAY vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) at 1.23%. This indicates that PMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PMAYEAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

1.23%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

2.42%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.56%

7.73%

+2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.69%

9.82%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.50%

9.82%

-1.32%