PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHV vs. MRFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHV vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 15.97% return, which is significantly higher than MRFOX's -0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHV has underperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 11.51%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.41% annualized return.


SCHV

1D
0.50%
1M
5.01%
YTD
15.97%
6M
16.54%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
11.51%

MRFOX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
-1.78%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHV vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
15.97%16.02%14.13%8.93%-7.65%25.58%2.64%25.92%-7.30%16.56%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
-0.99%10.05%17.10%17.68%5.06%17.71%15.19%36.26%1.89%25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHV and MRFOX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHV and MRFOX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHV vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MRFOX
MRFOX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MRFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MRFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHV vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHVMRFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.09

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

0.66

+3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.71

1.90

+15.81

SCHV vs. MRFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHV Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the MRFOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHV and MRFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHVMRFOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

0.48

+2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.91

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

1.09

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.06

-0.34

Drawdowns

SCHV vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and MRFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHVMRFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.08%

-29.10%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-7.03%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-7.91%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.78%

-12.98%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.08%

-29.10%

-7.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.39%

+3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-2.37%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.44%

-0.76%

Volatility

SCHV vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 2.49%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHVMRFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.49%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

6.94%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

9.77%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

12.06%

+2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

14.26%

+2.67%

SCHV vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHV vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison

SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than MRFOX's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
1.64%1.62%4.59%0.46%0.35%6.78%2.68%1.39%1.94%2.06%0.60%0.00%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.75%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHV and MRFOX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to MRFOX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs MRFOX's -29.10%.

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHV and MRFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer