PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRFOX vs. BIOPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRFOX vs. BIOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) and Baron Opportunity Fund (BIOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRFOX achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than BIOPX's 16.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MRFOX has underperformed BIOPX with an annualized return of 15.90%, while BIOPX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.22% annualized return.


MRFOX

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
1.40%
6M
0.81%
1Y
10.50%
3Y*
13.67%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
15.90%

BIOPX

1D
0.77%
1M
9.55%
YTD
16.82%
6M
15.41%
1Y
35.79%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
22.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRFOX vs. BIOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
1.40%10.05%17.10%17.68%5.06%17.71%15.19%36.26%1.89%25.92%
BIOPX
Baron Opportunity Fund
16.82%19.44%39.87%49.55%-42.96%11.90%88.78%40.34%8.06%40.58%

Correlation

The correlation between MRFOX and BIOPX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between MRFOX and BIOPX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRFOX vs. BIOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRFOX
MRFOX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MRFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MRFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BIOPX
BIOPX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BIOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BIOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRFOX vs. BIOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) and Baron Opportunity Fund (BIOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRFOXBIOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.47

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

8.08

-3.57

MRFOX vs. BIOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the BIOPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRFOX and BIOPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRFOX vs. BIOPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.10%, smaller than the maximum BIOPX drawdown of -67.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRFOX and BIOPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRFOXBIOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.10%

-67.91%

+38.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-14.16%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

-26.34%

+18.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.98%

-51.45%

+38.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.10%

-51.45%

+22.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.44%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-16.85%

+14.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

4.31%

-1.94%

Volatility

MRFOX vs. BIOPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) is 2.91%, while Baron Opportunity Fund (BIOPX) has a volatility of 9.18%. This indicates that MRFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRFOXBIOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

9.18%

-6.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

14.64%

-7.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

20.15%

-10.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.08%

26.93%

-14.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

24.99%

-10.74%

MRFOX vs. BIOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRFOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BIOPX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRFOX vs. BIOPX - Dividend Comparison

MRFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than BIOPX's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIOPX
Baron Opportunity Fund
3.63%4.24%4.95%0.00%0.00%8.71%6.96%7.33%5.29%15.58%13.52%10.92%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
1.60%1.62%4.59%0.46%0.35%6.78%2.68%1.39%1.94%2.06%0.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRFOX and BIOPX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIOPX has higher volatility (9.18%) compared to MRFOX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRFOX dropped -29.10% vs BIOPX's -67.91%.

BIOPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRFOX and BIOPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer