PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHV vs. MDLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHV vs. MDLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 15.97% return, which is significantly higher than MDLV's 10.95% return.


SCHV

1D
0.50%
1M
5.01%
YTD
15.97%
6M
16.54%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
11.51%

MDLV

1D
0.67%
1M
2.12%
YTD
10.95%
6M
11.88%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHV vs. MDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
15.97%16.02%14.13%10.14%
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
10.95%13.30%10.16%0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHV and MDLV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023

0.82

The correlation between SCHV and MDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHV vs. MDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHV
MDLV

Financial Services

19.6%
14.9%

Technology

18.2%
9.3%

Industrials

14.0%
15.0%

Healthcare

11.3%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%
8.2%

Energy

7.2%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
3.9%

Utilities

4.6%
15.2%

Real Estate

4.1%
2.2%

Basic Materials

2.8%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.5%
6.4%

Financial Services

SCHV
19.6%
MDLV
14.9%

Technology

SCHV
18.2%
MDLV
9.3%

Industrials

SCHV
14.0%
MDLV
15.0%

Healthcare

SCHV
11.3%
MDLV
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

SCHV
8.8%
MDLV
8.2%

Energy

SCHV
7.2%
MDLV
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHV
6.9%
MDLV
3.9%

Utilities

SCHV
4.6%
MDLV
15.2%

Real Estate

SCHV
4.1%
MDLV
2.2%

Basic Materials

SCHV
2.8%
MDLV
2.6%

Communication Services

SCHV
2.5%
MDLV
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHV vs. MDLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MDLV
MDLV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHV vs. MDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHVMDLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.42

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

5.01

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.71

15.75

+1.96

SCHV vs. MDLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHV Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the MDLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHV and MDLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHVMDLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.44

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.08

-0.36

Drawdowns

SCHV vs. MDLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than MDLV's maximum drawdown of -10.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and MDLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHVMDLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.08%

-10.71%

-26.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-4.27%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-10.71%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-2.29%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.36%

+0.32%

Volatility

SCHV vs. MDLV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHVMDLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.83%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

6.58%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

8.77%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

10.51%

+4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

10.51%

+6.42%

SCHV vs. MDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MDLV's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHV vs. MDLV - Dividend Comparison

SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than MDLV's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
2.78%3.00%2.78%2.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.75%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHV and MDLV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to MDLV (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs MDLV's -10.71%.

On 3-year performance, SCHV leads with 19.24% vs 13.07% for MDLV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 19.24% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MDLV.

MDLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.75% for SCHV.

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Morgan Dempsey. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.58% for MDLV.

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHV and MDLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer