SCHV vs. MDLV
SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and MDLV (Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. SCHV is passively managed, while MDLV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCHV returned 19.24%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for MDLV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for MDLV.
Performance
SCHV vs. MDLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 15.97% return, which is significantly higher than MDLV's 10.95% return.
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 15.97%
- 6M
- 16.54%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
MDLV
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 21.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV vs. MDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.97% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 10.14% |
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF | 10.95% | 13.30% | 10.16% | 0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHV and MDLV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SCHV and MDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHV vs. MDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHV
MDLV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
SCHV
MDLV
Technology
SCHV
MDLV
Industrials
SCHV
MDLV
Healthcare
SCHV
MDLV
Consumer Defensive
SCHV
MDLV
Energy
SCHV
MDLV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHV
MDLV
Utilities
SCHV
MDLV
Real Estate
SCHV
MDLV
Basic Materials
SCHV
MDLV
Communication Services
SCHV
MDLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHV vs. MDLV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHV
MDLV
SCHV vs. MDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHV | MDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.42 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.38 | 5.01 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.71 | 15.75 | +1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHV | MDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 2.44 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 1.08 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
SCHV vs. MDLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than MDLV's maximum drawdown of -10.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and MDLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHV | MDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -10.71% | -26.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -4.27% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | -10.71% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.42% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -2.29% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.36% | +0.32% |
Volatility
SCHV vs. MDLV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHV | MDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 2.83% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 6.58% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.63% | 8.77% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 10.51% | +4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 10.51% | +6.42% |
SCHV vs. MDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MDLV's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHV vs. MDLV - Dividend Comparison
SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than MDLV's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLV Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF | 2.78% | 3.00% | 2.78% | 2.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHV and MDLV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to MDLV (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs MDLV's -10.71%.
On 3-year performance, SCHV leads with 19.24% vs 13.07% for MDLV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 19.24% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MDLV.
MDLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.75% for SCHV.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Morgan Dempsey. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.58% for MDLV.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHV and MDLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer