SCHV vs. ILCV
SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and ILCV (iShares Morningstar Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index while ILCV tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHV returned 11.50%/yr vs 11.68%/yr for ILCV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHV vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's 7.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHV having a 11.50% annualized return and ILCV not far ahead at 11.68%.
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
ILCV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- 1Y
- 26.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.68%
SCHV vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 15.39% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 7.75% | 18.79% | 17.03% | 14.43% | -7.02% | 26.71% | -0.84% | 25.19% | -6.24% | 15.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHV and ILCV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009 | 0.96 |
The correlation between SCHV and ILCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHV vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHV
ILCV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
SCHV
ILCV
Technology
SCHV
ILCV
Industrials
SCHV
ILCV
Healthcare
SCHV
ILCV
Consumer Defensive
SCHV
ILCV
Energy
SCHV
ILCV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHV
ILCV
Utilities
SCHV
ILCV
Real Estate
SCHV
ILCV
Basic Materials
SCHV
ILCV
Communication Services
SCHV
ILCV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHV vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHV
ILCV
SCHV vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHV | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.50 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 4.08 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.96 | 16.87 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHV | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.72 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.81 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.70 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.46 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
SCHV vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and ILCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHV | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -58.63% | +21.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -6.55% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | -14.95% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.78% | -18.58% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.08% | -35.53% | -1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.60% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -9.32% | +5.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.58% | +0.11% |
Volatility
SCHV vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.01%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHV | ILCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 2.01% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 6.97% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.63% | 9.82% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 14.21% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 16.66% | +0.28% |
SCHV vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHV and ILCV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHV vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison
SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than ILCV's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCV iShares Morningstar Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.93% | 2.32% | 2.76% | 3.01% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHV and ILCV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to ILCV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs ILCV's -58.63%.
On 10-year performance, ILCV leads with 11.68% vs 11.50% for SCHV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 11.68% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV and ILCV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.63% for ILCV.
SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares.
ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHV and ILCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer