SCHV vs. HABDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and HABDX (Harbor Core Plus Fund) are both funds - SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while HABDX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Harbor. Over the past 10 years, SCHV returned 11.50%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for HABDX. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for HABDX.

Performance

SCHV vs. HABDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Harbor Core Plus Fund (HABDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly higher than HABDX's 0.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHV has outperformed HABDX with an annualized return of 11.50%, while HABDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.28% annualized return.

SCHV

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 5.65%
• YTD: 15.39%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 28.49%
• 3Y*: 18.86%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: 11.50%

HABDX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 0.56%
• 1Y: 5.80%
• 3Y*: 4.72%
• 5Y*: 0.72%
• 10Y*: 2.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHV vs. HABDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	15.39%	16.02%	14.13%	8.93%	-7.65%	25.58%	2.64%	25.92%	-7.30%	16.56%
HABDX Harbor Core Plus Fund	0.68%	7.28%	2.56%	6.70%	-13.23%	-0.64%	8.88%	8.42%	-0.20%	4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHV and HABDX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009	-0.07

The correlation between SCHV and HABDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SCHV vs. HABDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 81
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 82

HABDX

HABDX Risk / Return Rank: 30
HABDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
HABDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
HABDX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
HABDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
HABDX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHV vs. HABDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Harbor Core Plus Fund (HABDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHV	HABDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	1.57	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.84	2.36	+1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.28	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	2.14	+2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.96	6.43	+10.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHV vs. HABDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHV Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the HABDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHV and HABDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHV	HABDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	1.57	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.13	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.47	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	1.33	-0.61

Drawdowns

SCHV vs. HABDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than HABDX's maximum drawdown of -17.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and HABDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHV	HABDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-17.94%	-19.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	-2.73%	-4.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.26%	-6.15%	-9.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.78%	-17.94%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.08%	-17.94%	-19.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.22%	+1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-1.87%	-1.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	0.90%	+0.79%

Volatility

SCHV vs. HABDX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to Harbor Core Plus Fund (HABDX) at 1.27%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HABDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHV	HABDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	1.27%	+1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.13%	2.59%	+5.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.63%	3.72%	+6.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.51%	5.68%	+8.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.94%	4.83%	+12.11%

SCHV vs. HABDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HABDX's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHV vs. HABDX - Dividend Comparison

SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than HABDX's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HABDX Harbor Core Plus Fund	4.70%	4.65%	4.46%	4.24%	3.41%	3.12%	3.27%	3.19%	3.08%	3.41%	3.86%	5.40%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.76%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHV and HABDX in my portfolio?

SCHV and HABDX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHV or HABDX?

SCHV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to HABDX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs HABDX's -17.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.