HABDX vs. HSTRX
HABDX (Harbor Core Plus Fund) and HSTRX (Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund) are both mutual funds - HABDX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Harbor, while HSTRX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Hussman Funds. Over the past 10 years, HABDX returned 2.29%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for HSTRX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HABDX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HSTRX.
Performance
HABDX vs. HSTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HABDX achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than HSTRX's 3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, HABDX has underperformed HSTRX with an annualized return of 2.29%, while HSTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.11% annualized return.
HABDX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
HSTRX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 13.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 5.11%
HABDX vs. HSTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HABDX Harbor Core Plus Fund | 0.88% | 7.28% | 2.56% | 6.70% | -13.23% | -0.64% | 8.88% | 8.42% | -0.20% | 4.89% |
HSTRX Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund | 3.66% | 20.33% | 6.06% | 6.04% | -6.23% | 1.21% | 11.45% | 11.42% | 1.48% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between HABDX and HSTRX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2002 | 0.48 |
The correlation between HABDX and HSTRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HABDX vs. HSTRX — Risk / Return Rank
HABDX
HSTRX
HABDX vs. HSTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Core Plus Fund (HABDX) and Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HABDX | HSTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.56 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 5.65 | -3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 14.62 | -9.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HABDX vs. HSTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HABDX drawdown since its inception was -17.94%, which is greater than HSTRX's maximum drawdown of -13.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HABDX and HSTRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HABDX | HSTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.94% | -13.53% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -2.42% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.15% | -4.24% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.94% | -13.53% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.94% | -13.53% | -4.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -1.53% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -2.69% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.93% | +0.02% |
Volatility
HABDX vs. HSTRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Core Plus Fund (HABDX) is 1.11%, while Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that HABDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HABDX | HSTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 1.19% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 2.59% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 4.98% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.68% | 6.41% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 5.90% | -1.07% |
HABDX vs. HSTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HABDX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than HSTRX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HABDX vs. HSTRX - Dividend Comparison
HABDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than HSTRX's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HABDX Harbor Core Plus Fund | 4.69% | 4.65% | 4.46% | 4.24% | 3.41% | 3.12% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 3.08% | 3.41% | 3.86% | 5.40% |
HSTRX Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund | 2.37% | 2.25% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.15% | 1.33% | 0.52% | 1.29% | 1.20% | 0.37% | 0.25% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HABDX and HSTRX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSTRX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to HABDX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HABDX dropped -17.94% vs HSTRX's -13.53%.
HSTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HABDX and HSTRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer