SCHV vs. DLN
SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index while DLN tracks the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHV returned 11.85%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for DLN. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
SCHV vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHV has underperformed DLN with an annualized return of 11.85%, while DLN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.
SCHV
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 6M
- 15.22%
- 1Y
- 27.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.85%
DLN
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 20.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
SCHV vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 16.55% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 9.74% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 4.59% | 28.91% | -5.82% | 18.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHV and DLN is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SCHV and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHV vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHV
DLN
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
SCHV
DLN
Financial Services
SCHV
DLN
Industrials
SCHV
DLN
Healthcare
SCHV
DLN
Consumer Defensive
SCHV
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
SCHV
DLN
Energy
SCHV
DLN
Utilities
SCHV
DLN
Real Estate
SCHV
DLN
Basic Materials
SCHV
DLN
Communication Services
SCHV
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHV vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
SCHV
DLN
SCHV vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHV | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.41 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 3.37 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.00 | 14.09 | +1.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHV vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHV | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -57.84% | +20.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -6.10% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | -13.71% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.78% | -16.26% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.08% | -35.82% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -1.31% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -7.50% | +3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 1.45% | +0.25% |
Volatility
SCHV vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) at 2.70%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHV | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 2.70% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.76% | 6.99% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 9.01% | +2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 13.26% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 16.14% | +0.80% |
SCHV vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHV vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than DLN's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund | 1.58% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.32% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SCHV and DLN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHV has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to DLN (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 10-year performance, DLN leads with 12.83% vs 11.85% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 11.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DLN.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.75% for SCHV.
SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.28% for DLN.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHV and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer