SCHR vs. VTP
SCHR (Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while VTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHR vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHR achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than VTP's 1.55% return.
SCHR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHR vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.43% | 3.01% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHR and VTP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHR vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
SCHR
VTP
SCHR vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHR | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHR | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.31 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
SCHR vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHR drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHR and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHR | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -1.92% | -14.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -0.30% | -2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -0.52% | -3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | — | — |
Volatility
SCHR vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHR | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43% | 3.26% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 3.26% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 3.26% | +1.21% |
SCHR vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHR and VTP have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHR vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
SCHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.77% | 3.16% | 2.02% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.56% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHR and VTP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHR and VTP have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
SCHR has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
SCHR is categorized as Government Bonds, while VTP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SCHR tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard.
Find the right allocation for SCHR and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer