PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTP vs. SCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTP vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTP having a 1.55% return and SCHP slightly higher at 1.61%.


VTP

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHP

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.14%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
1.13%
10Y*
2.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTP vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTP and SCHP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTP vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTP

SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTP vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VTP vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTPSCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

0.51

+0.81

Drawdowns

VTP vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and SCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTPSCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-14.26%

+12.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.25%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-3.94%

+3.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

Volatility

VTP vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTPSCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26%

3.30%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.26%

6.12%

-2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.26%

5.59%

-2.33%

VTP vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTP vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than SCHP's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
3.99%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%
VTP
Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
1.61%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VTP and SCHP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VTP.

SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.

VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.03% for SCHP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTP and SCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer