VTP vs. SCHP
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5 while SCHP tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VTP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
VTP vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTP having a 1.55% return and SCHP slightly higher at 1.61%.
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.66%
VTP vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.61% | 2.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and SCHP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
SCHP
VTP vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTP | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.51 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
VTP vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -14.26% | +12.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.25% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -3.94% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.63% | — |
Volatility
VTP vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26% | 3.30% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 6.12% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 5.59% | -2.33% |
VTP vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTP vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than SCHP's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VTP and SCHP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VTP.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.03% for SCHP.
Find the right allocation for VTP and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer