PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHR vs. IMCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHR vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHR achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's 15.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHR has underperformed IMCB with an annualized return of 1.19%, while IMCB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.


SCHR

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.66%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
0.04%
1Y
3.42%
3Y*
3.71%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
1.19%

IMCB

1D
1.00%
1M
5.50%
YTD
15.22%
6M
14.34%
1Y
24.76%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHR vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHR
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
-0.27%7.33%1.42%4.27%-10.58%-2.62%7.72%6.18%1.46%1.59%
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
15.22%10.25%15.10%16.37%-16.09%22.81%13.35%31.49%-11.53%19.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHR and IMCB is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010

-0.18

The correlation between SCHR and IMCB shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHR vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHR
SCHR Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SCHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHR Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHR Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCB
IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHR vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHRIMCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.31

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.92

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.29

11.45

-8.16

SCHR vs. IMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHR Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the IMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHR and IMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHR vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHR drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHR and IMCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHRIMCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.11%

-58.80%

+42.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-8.05%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.35%

-19.80%

+15.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.07%

-25.15%

+10.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.11%

-40.99%

+24.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-0.26%

-1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-7.72%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

2.05%

-1.06%

Volatility

SCHR vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) is 1.11%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that SCHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHRIMCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

4.70%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

10.18%

-7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38%

13.25%

-9.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

17.64%

-12.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.47%

19.67%

-15.20%

SCHR vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHR vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison

SCHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than IMCB's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.21%1.42%1.43%1.55%1.70%1.08%1.12%1.32%1.80%1.31%1.79%1.47%
SCHR
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.91%3.85%3.77%3.16%2.02%1.00%1.62%2.31%2.11%1.65%1.45%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHR and IMCB have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMCB has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to SCHR (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHR dropped -16.11% vs IMCB's -58.80%.

On 10-year performance, IMCB leads with 11.53% vs 1.19% for SCHR. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHR has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 1.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHR.

SCHR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.21% for IMCB.

SCHR is categorized as Government Bonds, while IMCB is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SCHR tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHR and 0.04% for IMCB.

IMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHR and IMCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer