SCHP vs. PXF
SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) and PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while PXF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHP returned 2.60%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for PXF. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. SCHP charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PXF.
Performance
SCHP vs. PXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHP achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than PXF's 18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHP has underperformed PXF with an annualized return of 2.60%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.26% annualized return.
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
PXF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 39.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
SCHP vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.42% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 18.79% | 42.51% | 4.54% | 18.46% | -9.09% | 15.93% | 2.58% | 17.50% | -14.84% | 24.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHP and PXF is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | -0.03 |
The correlation between SCHP and PXF shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHP vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHP
PXF
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHP
PXF
Financial Services
SCHP
PXF
Basic Materials
SCHP
-
PXF
Communication Services
SCHP
-
PXF
Consumer Defensive
SCHP
-
PXF
Energy
SCHP
-
PXF
Healthcare
SCHP
-
PXF
Industrials
SCHP
-
PXF
Real Estate
SCHP
-
PXF
Technology
SCHP
-
PXF
Utilities
SCHP
-
PXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHP vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank
SCHP
PXF
SCHP vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHP | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.45 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 3.66 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 13.76 | -6.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHP vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHP drawdown since its inception was -14.26%, smaller than the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHP and PXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHP | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -64.74% | +50.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -10.91% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.48% | -14.06% | +9.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.26% | -26.82% | +12.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.26% | -41.59% | +27.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -2.04% | +1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -15.25% | +11.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 2.90% | -2.26% |
Volatility
SCHP vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) is 1.02%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that SCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHP | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 6.76% | -5.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 13.95% | -11.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30% | 16.18% | -12.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 16.62% | -10.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 18.07% | -12.48% |
SCHP vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHP vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison
SCHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than PXF's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.12% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHP and PXF have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXF has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHP dropped -14.26% vs PXF's -64.74%.
On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 12.26% vs 2.60% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 12.26% return vs 2.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 3.12% for PXF.
SCHP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while PXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L), while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHP and 0.45% for PXF.
PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHP and PXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer