SCHO vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHO returned 1.71%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for FNDF. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. SCHO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

SCHO vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHO achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 21.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHO has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 1.71%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.

SCHO

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 3.39%
• 3Y*: 4.15%
• 5Y*: 1.80%
• 10Y*: 1.71%

FNDF

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 6.97%
• YTD: 21.21%
• 6M: 24.72%
• 1Y: 44.71%
• 3Y*: 24.10%
• 5Y*: 13.35%
• 10Y*: 11.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHO vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	0.42%	5.49%	3.65%	4.31%	-3.87%	-0.64%	3.11%	3.47%	1.37%	0.33%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	21.21%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHO and FNDF is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	-0.05

The correlation between SCHO and FNDF shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHO vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHO	FNDF
Communication Services	1.1%	4.9%
Technology	1.1%	11.1%
Financial Services	0.2%	16.7%
Basic Materials	-	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.9%
Energy	-	12.3%
Healthcare	-	5.5%
Industrials	-	15.9%
Real Estate	-	0.9%
Utilities	-	3.8%

Return for Risk

SCHO vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHO

SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 81
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 84
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHO vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHO	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.99	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	3.89	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.53	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	4.24	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.03	16.19	+0.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHO vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHO Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHO and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHO	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.99	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.83	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.10	0.68	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	0.54	+0.46

Drawdowns

SCHO vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHO drawdown since its inception was -5.69%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHO and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHO	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-40.14%	+34.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.86%	-10.60%	+9.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.98%	-13.89%	+12.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.69%	-25.56%	+19.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-5.69%	-40.14%	+34.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.67%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-7.64%	+7.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	2.77%	-2.57%

Volatility

SCHO vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) is 0.41%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that SCHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHO	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.41%	5.26%	-4.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.90%	12.53%	-11.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37%	15.06%	-13.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.98%	16.18%	-14.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.56%	17.67%	-16.11%

SCHO vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHO vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

SCHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than FNDF's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.84%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	3.91%	4.06%	4.29%	3.76%	1.34%	0.41%	1.27%	2.27%	1.60%	1.12%	0.82%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHO and FNDF in my portfolio?

SCHO and FNDF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHO or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to SCHO (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHO dropped -5.69% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, SCHO or FNDF?

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 11.93% vs 1.71% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHO or FNDF?

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHO or FNDF?

SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHO or FNDF?

SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.84% for FNDF.

What is the main difference between SCHO and FNDF?

SCHO is categorized as Government Bonds, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHO and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.