PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHM vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHM vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 27.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHM has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 11.48%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.11% annualized return.


SCHM

1D
2.98%
1M
3.25%
YTD
18.78%
6M
15.85%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
11.48%

XLK

1D
3.73%
1M
4.57%
YTD
27.41%
6M
24.16%
1Y
53.33%
3Y*
30.17%
5Y*
21.81%
10Y*
25.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHM vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
18.78%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%19.60%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
27.41%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHM and XLK is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.74

The correlation between SCHM and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHM vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHM
XLK

Technology

22.5%
99.7%

Industrials

21.6%
0.1%

Healthcare

11.1%

-

Financial Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%

-

Real Estate

6.5%

-

Basic Materials

4.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.6%

-

Energy

3.6%
0.2%

Utilities

3.0%

-

Communication Services

2.5%

-

Technology

SCHM
22.5%
XLK
99.7%

Industrials

SCHM
21.6%
XLK
0.1%

Healthcare

SCHM
11.1%
XLK

-

Financial Services

SCHM
10.9%
XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

SCHM
9.7%
XLK

-

Real Estate

SCHM
6.5%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

SCHM
4.9%
XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

SCHM
3.6%
XLK

-

Energy

SCHM
3.6%
XLK
0.2%

Utilities

SCHM
3.0%
XLK

-

Communication Services

SCHM
2.5%
XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHM vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHM vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHMXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.37

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.51

10.91

+2.60

SCHM vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHM Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHM and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHM vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHMXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.43%

-82.05%

+39.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-15.92%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-25.66%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.46%

-33.56%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

-33.56%

-8.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-7.57%

+7.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-34.93%

+29.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

4.90%

-2.57%

Volatility

SCHM vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) is 5.59%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that SCHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHMXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

10.87%

-5.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

18.91%

-6.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.14%

22.54%

-6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

25.19%

-5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

24.64%

-4.14%

SCHM vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHM vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than XLK's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.42%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHM and XLK have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to SCHM (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.11% vs 11.48% for SCHM. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHM has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.11% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLK.

SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.42% for XLK.

SCHM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHM and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer