PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHM vs. PDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHM vs. PDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 19.05% return, which is significantly lower than PDP's 24.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHM has underperformed PDP with an annualized return of 11.37%, while PDP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.60% annualized return.


SCHM

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.28%
YTD
19.05%
6M
19.54%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.37%

PDP

1D
0.57%
1M
6.22%
YTD
24.95%
6M
24.18%
1Y
37.20%
3Y*
24.44%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHM vs. PDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
19.05%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%19.60%
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
24.95%8.37%26.06%20.88%-24.49%7.72%36.59%33.13%-5.96%23.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHM and PDP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2011

0.87

The correlation between SCHM and PDP shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHM vs. PDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHM
PDP

Technology

22.0%
26.9%

Industrials

21.4%
39.2%

Financial Services

11.3%
4.4%

Healthcare

10.8%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
5.5%

Real Estate

6.5%
1.3%

Basic Materials

4.7%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.8%

Energy

3.6%
6.3%

Utilities

3.0%
1.6%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.2%

Technology

SCHM
22.0%
PDP
26.9%

Industrials

SCHM
21.4%
PDP
39.2%

Financial Services

SCHM
11.3%
PDP
4.4%

Healthcare

SCHM
10.8%
PDP
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHM
10.3%
PDP
5.5%

Real Estate

SCHM
6.5%
PDP
1.3%

Basic Materials

SCHM
4.7%
PDP
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

SCHM
3.8%
PDP
3.8%

Energy

SCHM
3.6%
PDP
6.3%

Utilities

SCHM
3.0%
PDP
1.6%

Communication Services

SCHM
2.6%
PDP
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHM vs. PDP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PDP
PDP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDP Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHM vs. PDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHMPDPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.30

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

3.15

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.11

11.16

+2.95

SCHM vs. PDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHM Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the PDP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHM and PDP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHMPDPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.70

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.52

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.63

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.45

+0.14

Drawdowns

SCHM vs. PDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum PDP drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and PDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHMPDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.43%

-59.34%

+16.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-11.87%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-23.79%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.46%

-33.91%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

-34.70%

-7.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-10.61%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

3.34%

-1.03%

Volatility

SCHM vs. PDP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) is 4.72%, while Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that SCHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHMPDPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

6.51%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

17.34%

-5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

21.94%

-6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

22.00%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

21.59%

-1.13%

SCHM vs. PDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PDP's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHM vs. PDP - Dividend Comparison

SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than PDP's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.11%0.17%0.15%0.42%0.45%0.00%0.11%0.25%0.18%0.28%0.81%0.39%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHM and PDP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDP has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to SCHM (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs PDP's -59.34%.

On 10-year performance, PDP leads with 13.60% vs 11.37% for SCHM. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHM has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PDP has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.

SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.11% for PDP.

SCHM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PDP is Momentum. SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.62% for PDP.

SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHM and PDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer