SCHK vs. VOTE
SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) and VOTE (Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index, while VOTE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCHK returned 22.57%/yr vs 23.05%/yr for VOTE. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHK vs. VOTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCHK having a 11.59% return and VOTE slightly lower at 11.51%.
SCHK
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 22.57%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
VOTE
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 11.51%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK vs. VOTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 11.59% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 11.42% |
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF | 11.51% | 17.95% | 25.23% | 27.60% | -19.74% | 12.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHK and VOTE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SCHK and VOTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHK vs. VOTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHK
VOTE
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHK
VOTE
Financial Services
SCHK
VOTE
Communication Services
SCHK
VOTE
Consumer Cyclical
SCHK
VOTE
Industrials
SCHK
VOTE
Healthcare
SCHK
VOTE
Consumer Defensive
SCHK
VOTE
Energy
SCHK
VOTE
Utilities
SCHK
VOTE
Real Estate
SCHK
VOTE
Basic Materials
SCHK
VOTE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHK vs. VOTE — Risk / Return Rank
SCHK
VOTE
SCHK vs. VOTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHK | VOTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 3.16 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.67 | 14.50 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHK | VOTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.38 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.81 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
SCHK vs. VOTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHK drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, which is greater than VOTE's maximum drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHK and VOTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHK | VOTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.80% | -25.71% | -9.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | -9.10% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -19.08% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.27% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -6.14% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.98% | -0.04% |
Volatility
SCHK vs. VOTE - Volatility Comparison
Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) have volatilities of 2.94% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHK | VOTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 2.91% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 9.20% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 12.08% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 17.14% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 17.14% | +1.97% |
SCHK vs. VOTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHK and VOTE have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHK vs. VOTE - Dividend Comparison
SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than VOTE's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.00% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF | 0.89% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.54% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SCHK and VOTE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHK has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to VOTE (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHK dropped -34.80% vs VOTE's -25.71%.
On 3-year performance, VOTE leads with 23.05% vs 22.57% for SCHK. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VOTE has performed better with a 23.05% return vs 22.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK and VOTE have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.89% for VOTE.
SCHK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOTE is Large Cap Blend Equities. SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index, while VOTE tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Engine No. 1 LLC.
VOTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHK and VOTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer