SCHK vs. PAUG
SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) and PAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index, while PAUG is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHK returned 13.25%/yr vs 9.19%/yr for PAUG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PAUG.
Performance
SCHK vs. PAUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHK achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than PAUG's 5.02% return.
SCHK
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 22.57%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
PAUG
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- 15.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK vs. PAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 11.59% | 17.23% | 24.48% | 26.63% | -19.51% | 26.17% | 20.75% | 9.74% |
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 5.02% | 12.34% | 15.37% | 17.71% | -6.85% | 7.58% | 9.82% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHK and PAUG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SCHK and PAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHK vs. PAUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHK
PAUG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHK
PAUG
Financial Services
SCHK
PAUG
Communication Services
SCHK
PAUG
Consumer Cyclical
SCHK
PAUG
Industrials
SCHK
PAUG
Healthcare
SCHK
PAUG
Consumer Defensive
SCHK
PAUG
Energy
SCHK
PAUG
Utilities
SCHK
PAUG
Real Estate
SCHK
PAUG
Basic Materials
SCHK
PAUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHK vs. PAUG — Risk / Return Rank
SCHK
PAUG
SCHK vs. PAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHK | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.59 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 3.87 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.67 | 21.13 | -6.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHK | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.74 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 1.06 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.88 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
SCHK vs. PAUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHK drawdown since its inception was -34.80%, which is greater than PAUG's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHK and PAUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHK | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.80% | -17.88% | -16.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | -3.96% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -10.45% | -8.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -11.76% | -13.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | 0.00% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -1.81% | -3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 0.72% | +1.22% |
Volatility
SCHK vs. PAUG - Volatility Comparison
Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) at 0.56%. This indicates that SCHK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHK | PAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 0.56% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 4.18% | +5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 5.58% | +6.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 8.71% | +8.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 10.59% | +8.52% |
SCHK vs. PAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PAUG's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHK vs. PAUG - Dividend Comparison
SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while PAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.00% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SCHK and PAUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHK has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to PAUG (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHK dropped -34.80% vs PAUG's -17.88%.
On 5-year performance, SCHK leads with 13.25% vs 9.19% for PAUG. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, PAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PAUG.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for PAUG.
SCHK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PAUG is Defined Outcome. SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index, while PAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect August Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHK and 0.79% for PAUG.
PAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHK and PAUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer