SCHJ vs. TNXAX
SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and TNXAX (1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A) are both funds - SCHJ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while TNXAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by 1290 Funds. Over the past 5 years, SCHJ returned 2.31%/yr vs 5.54%/yr for TNXAX. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHJ charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TNXAX.
Performance
SCHJ vs. TNXAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than TNXAX's 5.31% return.
SCHJ
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- —
TNXAX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 5.31%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHJ vs. TNXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.56% | 6.80% | 4.89% | 6.36% | -5.73% | -0.67% | 5.30% | 0.61% |
TNXAX 1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A | 5.31% | 10.19% | 8.37% | 9.11% | -8.74% | 10.02% | 13.24% | 4.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHJ and TNXAX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHJ vs. TNXAX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHJ
TNXAX
SCHJ vs. TNXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and 1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A (TNXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHJ | TNXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.53 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 2.52 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | 9.63 | +2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHJ | TNXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.55 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.71 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.79 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
SCHJ vs. TNXAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum TNXAX drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and TNXAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHJ | TNXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -20.07% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.47% | -5.58% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.47% | -9.89% | +8.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.43% | -17.80% | +8.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | 0.00% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -2.94% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 1.46% | -1.09% |
Volatility
SCHJ vs. TNXAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) is 0.55%, while 1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A (TNXAX) has a volatility of 1.80%. This indicates that SCHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHJ | TNXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 1.80% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.35% | 4.71% | -3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87% | 5.52% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 7.86% | -4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 9.00% | -4.87% |
SCHJ vs. TNXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TNXAX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHJ vs. TNXAX - Dividend Comparison
SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than TNXAX's 7.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TNXAX 1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A | 7.86% | 7.45% | 9.48% | 5.31% | 4.42% | 9.95% | 7.91% | 5.34% | 4.75% | 6.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHJ and TNXAX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TNXAX has higher volatility (1.80%) compared to SCHJ (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs TNXAX's -20.07%.
TNXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHJ and TNXAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer