SCHJ vs. SCHX
SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHJ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHJ returned 2.34%/yr vs 13.39%/yr for SCHX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHJ charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
SCHJ vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 11.20% return.
SCHJ
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.56%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- 1Y
- 27.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.63%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
SCHJ vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.72% | 6.80% | 4.89% | 6.36% | -5.73% | -0.67% | 5.30% | 0.61% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 11.20% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 10.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHJ and SCHX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019 | 0.24 |
SCHJ vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHJ
SCHX
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
SCHJ
SCHX
Technology
SCHJ
SCHX
Healthcare
SCHJ
SCHX
Industrials
SCHJ
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
SCHJ
SCHX
Utilities
SCHJ
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
SCHJ
SCHX
Communication Services
SCHJ
SCHX
Real Estate
SCHJ
SCHX
Energy
SCHJ
SCHX
Basic Materials
SCHJ
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHJ vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHJ
SCHX
SCHJ vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHJ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.42 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 3.11 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.09 | 14.13 | -2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHJ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.34 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.79 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.85 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
SCHJ vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHJ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -34.33% | +20.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.47% | -9.02% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.47% | -19.04% | +17.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.43% | -25.41% | +15.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.27% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -3.97% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 1.98% | -1.61% |
Volatility
SCHJ vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) is 0.57%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that SCHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHJ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 2.86% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.36% | 9.03% | -7.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88% | 11.98% | -10.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 17.12% | -14.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 18.14% | -14.01% |
SCHJ vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHJ vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than SCHX's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHJ and SCHX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to SCHJ (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 13.39% vs 2.34% for SCHJ. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 13.39% return vs 2.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHJ.
SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 1.00% for SCHX.
SCHJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHJ and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer