PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHJ vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHJ vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 66.08% return.


SCHJ

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.18%
6M
0.62%
YTD
0.58%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*

DBE

1D
6.87%
1M
-1.18%
6M
62.18%
YTD
66.08%
1Y
53.22%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHJ vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.58%6.80%4.89%6.36%-5.73%-0.67%5.30%0.61%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
66.08%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%12.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHJ and DBE is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SCHJ and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.40, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHJ vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHJ
SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHJ vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHJDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.16

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.81

6.57

+3.25

SCHJ vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHJ and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHJ vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHJDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-86.69%

+73.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-24.72%

+23.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-24.72%

+23.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.43%

-38.74%

+29.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-36.95%

+36.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-57.20%

+55.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

8.13%

-7.75%

Volatility

SCHJ vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) is 0.71%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.49%. This indicates that SCHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHJDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

12.49%

-11.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

32.73%

-31.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93%

36.03%

-34.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.95%

29.89%

-26.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.11%

28.40%

-24.29%

SCHJ vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHJ vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than DBE's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.33%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%4.42%4.00%2.98%1.64%0.94%2.54%0.42%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHJ and DBE have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.49%) compared to SCHJ (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 16.54% vs 2.31% for SCHJ. On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 16.54% return vs 2.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 2.33% for DBE.

SCHJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.78% for DBE.

SCHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHJ and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer