SCHH vs. URE
SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) and URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) are both REIT funds - SCHH tracks the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index while URE tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHH returned 4.31%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for URE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHH charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for URE.
Performance
SCHH vs. URE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly lower than URE's 20.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has outperformed URE with an annualized return of 4.31%, while URE has yielded a comparatively lower 3.29% annualized return.
SCHH
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 15.79%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 17.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.31%
URE
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 20.85%
- 6M
- 20.09%
- 1Y
- 15.47%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- -3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.29%
SCHH vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 15.79% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 3.68% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 20.85% | -3.65% | 0.35% | 11.58% | -49.64% | 88.24% | -28.06% | 57.86% | -13.80% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHH and URE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.98 |
The correlation between SCHH and URE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHH vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank
SCHH
URE
SCHH vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHH | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.12 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 0.94 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.60 | 2.28 | +4.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHH vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and URE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHH | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.22% | -97.16% | +52.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -16.50% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -33.77% | +16.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.28% | -63.66% | +30.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.22% | -70.49% | +26.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -49.82% | +49.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -64.46% | +55.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 6.79% | -4.17% |
Volatility
SCHH vs. URE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) is 5.34%, while ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a volatility of 10.64%. This indicates that SCHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHH | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 10.64% | -5.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.40% | 21.24% | -10.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.82% | 28.03% | -14.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 37.43% | -18.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 40.62% | -19.61% |
SCHH vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than URE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHH vs. URE - Dividend Comparison
SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than URE's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.76% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 2.02% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SCHH and URE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
URE has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to SCHH (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs URE's -97.16%.
On 10-year performance, SCHH leads with 4.31% vs 3.29% for URE. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 5.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHH has performed better with a 4.31% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.
SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.02% for URE.
SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.95% for URE.
SCHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHH and URE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer