PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHH vs. SCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHH vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 4.14%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


SCHH

1D
-1.35%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
12.43%
6M
12.55%
1Y
12.92%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
4.14%

SCHP

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHH vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
12.43%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
0.96%6.76%1.95%3.91%-12.02%5.87%10.86%8.52%-1.78%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHH and SCHP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2011

0.12

Over the past year, SCHH and SCHP have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

SCHH vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHH
SCHP

Real Estate

98.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.3%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
0.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

100.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

SCHH
98.5%
SCHP

-

Basic Materials

SCHH
1.3%
SCHP

-

Financial Services

SCHH
0.2%
SCHP
0.0%

Communication Services

SCHH

-

SCHP

-

Consumer Cyclical

SCHH

-

SCHP
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCHH

-

SCHP

-

Energy

SCHH

-

SCHP

-

Healthcare

SCHH

-

SCHP

-

Industrials

SCHH

-

SCHP

-

Technology

SCHH

-

SCHP

-

Utilities

SCHH

-

SCHP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHH vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHH vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHHSCHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.26

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.50

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

7.59

-2.66

SCHH vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHH Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the SCHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHH and SCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHHSCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.47

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.17

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.45

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.50

-0.16

Drawdowns

SCHH vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and SCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHHSCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-14.26%

-29.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-1.93%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-4.48%

-13.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

-14.26%

-19.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-14.26%

-29.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-0.89%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-3.93%

-5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

0.63%

+2.00%

Volatility

SCHH vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison

Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that SCHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHHSCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

1.00%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

2.24%

+7.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

3.29%

+10.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

6.12%

+12.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

5.59%

+15.39%

SCHH vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHH vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than SCHP's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.79%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
4.01%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHH and SCHP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHH has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs SCHP's -14.26%.

On 10-year performance, SCHH leads with 4.14% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHH has performed better with a 4.14% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SCHH.

SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 2.79% for SCHH.

SCHH is categorized as REIT, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.03% for SCHP.

SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHH and SCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer