PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHH vs. IDGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHH vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 48.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed IDGT with an annualized return of 4.16%, while IDGT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.61% annualized return.


SCHH

1D
1.24%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
13.92%
6M
14.36%
1Y
14.58%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
4.16%

IDGT

1D
1.64%
1M
1.10%
YTD
48.60%
6M
47.03%
1Y
58.23%
3Y*
24.83%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
14.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHH vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
13.92%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
48.60%6.79%26.71%-6.09%-17.90%42.14%8.78%17.39%-1.97%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHH and IDGT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.47

The correlation between SCHH and IDGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHH vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHH vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHHIDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.46

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

6.49

-4.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.53

18.73

-13.20

SCHH vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHH Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHH and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHH vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and IDGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHHIDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-77.95%

+33.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-9.02%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-23.74%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

-35.83%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-36.88%

-7.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.07%

-4.96%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-19.88%

+10.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

3.12%

-0.48%

Volatility

SCHH vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) is 5.21%, while iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that SCHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHHIDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

9.03%

-3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

17.48%

-7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.86%

21.36%

-7.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.76%

23.34%

-4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

23.38%

-2.36%

SCHH vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHH vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than IDGT's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.72%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.75%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHH and IDGT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDGT has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to SCHH (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

On 10-year performance, IDGT leads with 14.61% vs 4.16% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 14.61% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for IDGT.

SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 0.72% for IDGT.

SCHH is categorized as REIT, while IDGT is Technology Equities. SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.41% for IDGT.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHH and IDGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer