SCHG vs. XAIX
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and XAIX (Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while XAIX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SCHG returned 20.82% vs 54.71% for XAIX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAIX.
Performance
SCHG vs. XAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than XAIX's 30.20% return.
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 24.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
XAIX
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 30.20%
- 6M
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 54.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG vs. XAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 3.75% | 17.50% | 16.43% |
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF | 30.20% | 29.05% | 15.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and XAIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SCHG and XAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHG vs. XAIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHG
XAIX
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Technology
SCHG
XAIX
Communication Services
SCHG
XAIX
Consumer Cyclical
SCHG
XAIX
Healthcare
SCHG
XAIX
Financial Services
SCHG
XAIX
Industrials
SCHG
XAIX
Consumer Defensive
SCHG
XAIX
Basic Materials
SCHG
XAIX
Energy
SCHG
XAIX
Real Estate
SCHG
XAIX
-
Utilities
SCHG
XAIX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. XAIX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
XAIX
SCHG vs. XAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHG | XAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.43 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 3.92 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 14.14 | -9.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHG | XAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 2.45 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.81 | -0.98 |
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. XAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than XAIX's maximum drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and XAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | XAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -23.95% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -14.01% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -8.33% | +4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -3.51% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 3.88% | +1.03% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. XAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 4.52%, while Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) has a volatility of 12.81%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | XAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 12.81% | -8.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 19.45% | -7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 22.47% | -6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 24.10% | -1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 24.10% | -2.52% |
SCHG vs. XAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XAIX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHG vs. XAIX - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than XAIX's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHG and XAIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAIX has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to SCHG (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs XAIX's -23.95%.
On 1-year performance, XAIX leads with 54.71% vs 20.82% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XAIX has performed better with a 54.71% return vs 20.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAIX.
XAIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.
SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XAIX is Technology Equities. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while XAIX tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.35% for XAIX.
XAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and XAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer