SCHG vs. TSPA
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and TSPA (T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while TSPA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. SCHG is passively managed, while TSPA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCHG returned 24.03%/yr vs 22.03%/yr for TSPA. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for TSPA.
Performance
SCHG vs. TSPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than TSPA's 9.02% return.
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 24.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
TSPA
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 22.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG vs. TSPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 3.75% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 18.90% |
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | 9.02% | 16.44% | 26.37% | 29.95% | -18.70% | 13.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and TSPA is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SCHG and TSPA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHG vs. TSPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHG
TSPA
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
SCHG
TSPA
Communication Services
SCHG
TSPA
Consumer Cyclical
SCHG
TSPA
Healthcare
SCHG
TSPA
Financial Services
SCHG
TSPA
Industrials
SCHG
TSPA
Consumer Defensive
SCHG
TSPA
Basic Materials
SCHG
TSPA
Energy
SCHG
TSPA
Real Estate
SCHG
TSPA
Utilities
SCHG
TSPA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. TSPA — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
TSPA
SCHG vs. TSPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHG | TSPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 2.65 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 12.24 | -7.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHG | TSPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.95 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.83 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. TSPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than TSPA's maximum drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and TSPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | TSPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -24.72% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -9.24% | -7.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -19.04% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -24.72% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -2.71% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -5.48% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 2.00% | +2.91% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. TSPA - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) at 3.90%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | TSPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 3.90% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 9.88% | +2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 12.57% | +3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 17.03% | +5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 17.03% | +4.55% |
SCHG vs. TSPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TSPA's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHG vs. TSPA - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than TSPA's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.50% | 0.41% | 1.16% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SCHG and TSPA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHG has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to TSPA (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs TSPA's -24.72%.
On 3-year performance, SCHG leads with 24.03% vs 22.03% for TSPA. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TSPA has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 24.03% return vs 22.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for TSPA.
TSPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.
SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TSPA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.34% for TSPA.
TSPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and TSPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer