PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHG vs. TSPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHG vs. TSPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than TSPA's 9.02% return.


SCHG

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
3.75%
6M
2.93%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
24.03%
5Y*
14.90%
10Y*
18.53%

TSPA

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
9.02%
6M
9.17%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. TSPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
3.75%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%18.90%
TSPA
T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF
9.02%16.44%26.37%29.95%-18.70%13.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and TSPA is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021

0.94

The correlation between SCHG and TSPA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHG vs. TSPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHG
TSPA

Technology

46.3%
36.0%

Communication Services

16.0%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
10.0%

Healthcare

7.7%
8.6%

Financial Services

6.7%
12.3%

Industrials

5.8%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
4.7%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.8%

Energy

0.8%
3.6%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.7%

Utilities

0.4%
2.8%

Technology

SCHG
46.3%
TSPA
36.0%

Communication Services

SCHG
16.0%
TSPA
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHG
12.7%
TSPA
10.0%

Healthcare

SCHG
7.7%
TSPA
8.6%

Financial Services

SCHG
6.7%
TSPA
12.3%

Industrials

SCHG
5.8%
TSPA
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

SCHG
1.7%
TSPA
4.7%

Basic Materials

SCHG
1.4%
TSPA
1.8%

Energy

SCHG
0.8%
TSPA
3.6%

Real Estate

SCHG
0.5%
TSPA
1.7%

Utilities

SCHG
0.4%
TSPA
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHG vs. TSPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

TSPA
TSPA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. TSPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHGTSPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

2.65

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.25

12.24

-7.99

SCHG vs. TSPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the TSPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and TSPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHGTSPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.95

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.83

+0.01

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. TSPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than TSPA's maximum drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and TSPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHGTSPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-24.72%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.41%

-9.24%

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-19.04%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-24.72%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.25%

-2.71%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-5.48%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

2.00%

+2.91%

Volatility

SCHG vs. TSPA - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) at 3.90%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHGTSPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

3.90%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

9.88%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.77%

12.57%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.31%

17.03%

+5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

17.03%

+4.55%

SCHG vs. TSPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TSPA's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHG vs. TSPA - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than TSPA's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.37%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
TSPA
T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF
0.57%0.62%0.50%0.41%1.16%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SCHG and TSPA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHG has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to TSPA (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs TSPA's -24.72%.

On 3-year performance, SCHG leads with 24.03% vs 22.03% for TSPA. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TSPA has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 24.03% return vs 22.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for TSPA.

TSPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TSPA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.34% for TSPA.

TSPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHG and TSPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer