PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHG vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHG vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 31.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has outperformed REMX with an annualized return of 18.85%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.15% annualized return.


SCHG

1D
2.39%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
5.03%
6M
5.98%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
23.27%
5Y*
14.85%
10Y*
18.85%

REMX

1D
1.46%
1M
0.33%
YTD
31.07%
6M
39.68%
1Y
148.89%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
5.03%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
31.07%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and REMX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010

0.51

The correlation between SCHG and REMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHG vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHG
REMX

Technology

46.7%

-

Communication Services

15.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Financial Services

6.6%

-

Industrials

6.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.3%
100.0%

Energy

0.7%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Utilities

0.4%

-

Technology

SCHG
46.7%
REMX

-

Communication Services

SCHG
15.3%
REMX

-

Consumer Cyclical

SCHG
12.4%
REMX

-

Healthcare

SCHG
8.4%
REMX

-

Financial Services

SCHG
6.6%
REMX

-

Industrials

SCHG
6.0%
REMX

-

Consumer Defensive

SCHG
1.6%
REMX

-

Basic Materials

SCHG
1.3%
REMX
100.0%

Energy

SCHG
0.7%
REMX

-

Real Estate

SCHG
0.5%
REMX

-

Utilities

SCHG
0.4%
REMX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHG vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHGREMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

6.41

-4.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

17.25

-12.57

SCHG vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and REMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHGREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-90.20%

+55.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.41%

-23.35%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-62.11%

+38.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-73.34%

+38.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-73.34%

+38.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-55.63%

+52.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-66.83%

+61.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

8.66%

-3.69%

Volatility

SCHG vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 5.59%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 16.59%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHGREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

16.59%

-11.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.52%

37.16%

-24.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

49.84%

-33.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.35%

40.64%

-18.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.60%

37.15%

-15.55%

SCHG vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHG vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than REMX's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
1.34%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.37%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHG and REMX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (16.59%) compared to SCHG (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs REMX's -90.20%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.85% vs 10.15% for REMX. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 10.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.

REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.59% for REMX.

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHG and REMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer