SCHG vs. PLTR

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SCHG returned 13.32%/yr vs 43.04%/yr for PLTR. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

SCHG vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -24.14% return.

SCHG

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.84%
• 6M: 5.77%
• YTD: 4.93%
• 1Y: 15.31%
• 3Y*: 21.96%
• 5Y*: 13.32%
• 10Y*: 18.26%
• ALL TIME*: 16.37%

PLTR

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: 4.97%
• 6M: -21.12%
• YTD: -24.14%
• 1Y: -12.16%
• 3Y*: 101.71%
• 5Y*: 43.04%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 56.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	4.93%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	12.61%
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc.	-24.14%	135.03%	340.48%	167.45%	-64.74%	-22.68%	135.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and PLTR is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020	0.59

The correlation between SCHG and PLTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCHG vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 30
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 32
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 29

PLTR

PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 35
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHG	PLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	-0.24	+1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	0.01	+1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.00	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	-0.25	+1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.00	-0.50	+3.50

SCHG vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and PLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHG	PLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.59%	-84.62%	+50.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.41%	-48.22%	+31.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.39%	-48.22%	+24.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.59%	-79.14%	+44.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.16%	-34.91%	+31.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-40.25%	+35.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.12%	24.39%	-19.27%

Volatility

SCHG vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 4.47%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 15.76%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHG	PLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	15.76%	-11.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.82%	39.68%	-26.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.43%	51.53%	-35.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.40%	65.63%	-43.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.57%	69.51%	-47.94%

Dividends

SCHG vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.39%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHG and PLTR in my portfolio?

SCHG and PLTR have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHG or PLTR?

PLTR has higher volatility (15.76%) compared to SCHG (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.