SCHG vs. O
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while O (Realty Income Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SCHG returned 18.26%/yr vs 4.36%/yr for O. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHG vs. O - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than O's 18.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has outperformed O with an annualized return of 18.26%, while O has yielded a comparatively lower 4.36% annualized return.
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.37%
O
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- YTD
- 18.67%
- 1Y
- 21.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- 4.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.59%
SCHG vs. O - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 4.93% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
O Realty Income Corporation | 18.67% | 12.20% | -2.11% | -4.55% | -7.38% | 23.95% | -11.60% | 21.27% | 15.94% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and O is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.31 |
The correlation between SCHG and O shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. O — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
O
SCHG vs. O - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Realty Income Corporation (O). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHG | O | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.97 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.00 | 4.49 | -1.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. O - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum O drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and O.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | O | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -48.45% | +13.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -11.10% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -26.49% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -34.48% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | -48.28% | +13.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -1.83% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -9.19% | +4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 4.87% | +0.25% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. O - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 4.47%, while Realty Income Corporation (O) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than O based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | O | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 6.36% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 13.00% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.43% | 16.78% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 19.03% | +3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 25.68% | -4.11% |
Dividends
SCHG vs. O - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than O's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O Realty Income Corporation | 4.97% | 6.19% | 5.37% | 5.33% | 4.68% | 3.87% | 4.51% | 3.69% | 4.19% | 4.45% | 4.18% | 4.41% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHG and O have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
O has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to SCHG (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs O's -48.45%.
O currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and O
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer