SCHG vs. NVDG.F
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while NVDG.F (NVIDIA Corporation CDR) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SCHG returned 22.68%/yr vs 68.42%/yr for NVDG.F. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SCHG is traded in USD, while NVDG.F is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NVDG.F values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG.F's 13.45% return.
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
NVDG.F
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- 41.10%
- 3Y*
- 68.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.58% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -20.79% |
NVDG.F NVIDIA Corporation CDR | 13.45% | 35.40% | 159.49% | 239.31% | -40.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and NVDG.F is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2022 | 0.33 |
The correlation between SCHG and NVDG.F shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. NVDG.F — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
NVDG.F
SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHG | NVDG.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 2.22 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | 5.19 | -1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum NVDG.F drawdown of -64.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and NVDG.F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | NVDG.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -64.73% | +30.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -20.95% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -39.19% | +15.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -10.91% | +5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -16.94% | +11.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 8.99% | -4.03% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 5.14%, while NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F) has a volatility of 12.52%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDG.F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | NVDG.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 12.52% | -7.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 29.29% | -16.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 43.26% | -27.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 62.45% | -40.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 62.45% | -40.87% |
Dividends
SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than NVDG.F's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDG.F NVIDIA Corporation CDR | 0.11% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHG and NVDG.F have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and NVDG.F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer