PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHG vs. NVDG.F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SCHG is traded in USD, while NVDG.F is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NVDG.F values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG.F's 13.45% return.


SCHG

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
2.58%
6M
2.96%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
18.50%

NVDG.F

1D
-2.74%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
13.45%
6M
17.63%
1Y
41.10%
3Y*
68.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.58%17.50%34.95%50.10%-20.79%
NVDG.F
NVIDIA Corporation CDR
13.45%35.40%159.49%239.31%-40.96%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and NVDG.F is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2022

0.33

The correlation between SCHG and NVDG.F shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHG vs. NVDG.F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDG.F
NVDG.F Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NVDG.F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG.F Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG.F Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG.F Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG.F Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHGNVDG.FDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.20

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

2.22

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

5.19

-1.41

SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the NVDG.F Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and NVDG.F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum NVDG.F drawdown of -64.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and NVDG.F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHGNVDG.FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-64.73%

+30.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.41%

-20.95%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-39.19%

+15.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-10.91%

+5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-16.94%

+11.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.96%

8.99%

-4.03%

Volatility

SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 5.14%, while NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F) has a volatility of 12.52%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDG.F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHGNVDG.FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

12.52%

-7.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

29.29%

-16.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.95%

43.26%

-27.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

62.45%

-40.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

62.45%

-40.87%

Dividends

SCHG vs. NVDG.F - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than NVDG.F's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDG.F
NVIDIA Corporation CDR
0.11%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHG and NVDG.F have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHG and NVDG.F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer