SCHG vs. GPIX
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. SCHG is passively managed, while GPIX is actively managed. Over the past year, SCHG returned 20.82% vs 22.98% for GPIX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.
Performance
SCHG vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 8.17% return.
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 24.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
GPIX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 22.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 3.75% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 18.57% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.17% | 16.25% | 21.77% | 13.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and GPIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SCHG and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHG vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHG
GPIX
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
SCHG
GPIX
Communication Services
SCHG
GPIX
Consumer Cyclical
SCHG
GPIX
Healthcare
SCHG
GPIX
Financial Services
SCHG
GPIX
Industrials
SCHG
GPIX
Consumer Defensive
SCHG
GPIX
Basic Materials
SCHG
GPIX
Energy
SCHG
GPIX
Real Estate
SCHG
GPIX
Utilities
SCHG
GPIX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
GPIX
SCHG vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHG | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.42 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 2.99 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 14.96 | -10.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHG | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 2.22 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.71 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and GPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -17.50% | -17.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -7.71% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -2.06% | -2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -1.48% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 1.54% | +3.37% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 3.07%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 3.07% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 8.22% | +3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 10.40% | +5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 13.84% | +8.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 13.84% | +7.74% |
SCHG vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHG vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than GPIX's 8.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.13% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SCHG and GPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHG has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to GPIX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs GPIX's -17.50%.
On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 22.98% vs 20.82% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 22.98% return vs 20.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIX.
GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.13%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.
SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GPIX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.29% for GPIX.
GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and GPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer