SCHG vs. GLD
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHG returned 18.50%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for GLD. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
SCHG vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 18.50%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.15% annualized return.
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
GLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -10.21%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 23.81%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
SCHG vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.58% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -2.47% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and GLD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.05 |
The correlation between SCHG and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHG vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHG
GLD
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SCHG
GLD
-
Communication Services
SCHG
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHG
GLD
-
Healthcare
SCHG
GLD
-
Financial Services
SCHG
GLD
-
Industrials
SCHG
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHG
GLD
-
Basic Materials
SCHG
GLD
Energy
SCHG
GLD
-
Real Estate
SCHG
GLD
-
Utilities
SCHG
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
GLD
SCHG vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHG | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 0.98 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | 2.81 | +0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -45.56% | +10.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -24.46% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -24.46% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -24.46% | -10.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | -24.46% | -10.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -22.05% | +16.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -16.16% | +10.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 8.49% | -3.53% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 5.14%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 7.79%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 7.79% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 24.10% | -11.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 27.37% | -11.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 18.22% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 16.08% | +5.50% |
SCHG vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHG vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHG and GLD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to SCHG (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.50% vs 12.15% for GLD. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GLD is Gold. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.40% for GLD.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer