SCHG vs. DYNF

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while DYNF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares. SCHG is passively managed, while DYNF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHG returned 14.85%/yr vs 15.35%/yr for DYNF. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for DYNF.

Performance

SCHG vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than DYNF's 12.25% return.

SCHG

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 5.03%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 23.20%
• 3Y*: 23.27%
• 5Y*: 14.85%
• 10Y*: 18.85%

DYNF

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: 2.71%
• YTD: 12.25%
• 6M: 12.86%
• 1Y: 31.46%
• 3Y*: 25.36%
• 5Y*: 15.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	5.03%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	18.31%
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF	12.25%	20.00%	30.29%	36.25%	-20.27%	22.12%	13.47%	14.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and DYNF is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019	0.92

The correlation between SCHG and DYNF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHG vs. DYNF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHG	DYNF
Technology	46.7%	40.1%
Communication Services	15.3%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	7.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	6.1%
Financial Services	6.6%	14.9%
Industrials	6.0%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	1.7%
Basic Materials	1.3%	0.8%
Energy	0.7%	5.0%
Real Estate	0.5%	2.0%
Utilities	0.4%	2.8%

Return for Risk

SCHG vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 40
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

DYNF

DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 82
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 82
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHG	DYNF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	2.41	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	3.23	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.43	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	3.65	-2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.68	17.10	-12.41

SCHG vs. DYNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the DYNF Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and DYNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, roughly equal to the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and DYNF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHG	DYNF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.59%	-34.72%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.41%	-8.67%	-7.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.39%	-18.70%	-4.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.59%	-28.65%	-5.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	0.00%	-3.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-5.96%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.97%	1.85%	+3.12%

Volatility

SCHG vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) at 5.25%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHG	DYNF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	5.25%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.52%	10.57%	+1.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.09%	13.14%	+2.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.35%	17.61%	+4.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.60%	19.92%	+1.68%

SCHG vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DYNF's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHG vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than DYNF's 1.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF	1.06%	1.01%	0.65%	1.11%	1.66%	2.89%	1.52%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHG and DYNF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SCHG and DYNF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCHG or DYNF?

SCHG has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to DYNF (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs DYNF's -34.72%.

Which ETF is better, SCHG or DYNF?

On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 15.35% vs 14.85% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHG or DYNF?

Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 14.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHG or DYNF?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DYNF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHG or DYNF?

DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between SCHG and DYNF?

SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DYNF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.26% for DYNF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.