SCHG vs. BTM
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while BTM (Bitcoin Depot Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, SCHG returned 19.69% vs -98.50% for BTM. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHG vs. BTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly higher than BTM's -94.55% return.
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 19.69%
- 3Y*
- 23.70%
- 5Y*
- 14.48%
- 10Y*
- 18.43%
BTM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -90.34%
- YTD
- -94.55%
- 6M
- -94.91%
- 1Y
- -98.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG vs. BTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.92% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 10.99% |
BTM Bitcoin Depot Inc. | -94.55% | -20.37% | -49.85% | -18.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and BTM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. BTM — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
BTM
SCHG vs. BTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Bitcoin Depot Inc. (BTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHG | BTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.68 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | -0.99 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | -1.41 | +5.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHG | BTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | -0.66 | +1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | -0.63 | +1.46 |
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. BTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum BTM drawdown of -98.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and BTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | BTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -98.92% | +64.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -98.92% | +82.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.01% | -98.92% | +93.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -55.29% | +50.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 69.47% | -64.55% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. BTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 4.53%, while Bitcoin Depot Inc. (BTM) has a volatility of 146.68%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | BTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 146.68% | -142.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | 173.19% | -161.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 148.74% | -132.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 118.29% | -95.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 118.29% | -96.72% |
Dividends
SCHG vs. BTM - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while BTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTM Bitcoin Depot Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHG and BTM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTM has higher volatility (146.68%) compared to SCHG (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs BTM's -98.92%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and BTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer