PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHG vs. BTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHG vs. BTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Bitcoin Depot Inc. (BTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly higher than BTM's -94.55% return.


SCHG

1D
-0.80%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
2.92%
6M
2.08%
1Y
19.69%
3Y*
23.70%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
18.43%

BTM

1D
0.00%
1M
-90.34%
YTD
-94.55%
6M
-94.91%
1Y
-98.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. BTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.92%17.50%34.95%10.99%
BTM
Bitcoin Depot Inc.
-94.55%-20.37%-49.85%-18.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and BTM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHG vs. BTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BTM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. BTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Bitcoin Depot Inc. (BTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHGBTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.68

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

-0.99

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

-1.41

+5.42

SCHG vs. BTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the BTM Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and BTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHGBTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

-0.66

+1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

-0.63

+1.46

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. BTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum BTM drawdown of -98.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and BTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHGBTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-98.92%

+64.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.41%

-98.92%

+82.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-98.92%

+93.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-55.29%

+50.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

69.47%

-64.55%

Volatility

SCHG vs. BTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 4.53%, while Bitcoin Depot Inc. (BTM) has a volatility of 146.68%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHGBTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

146.68%

-142.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

173.19%

-161.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.77%

148.74%

-132.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.31%

118.29%

-95.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

118.29%

-96.72%

Dividends

SCHG vs. BTM - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while BTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTM
Bitcoin Depot Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHG and BTM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTM has higher volatility (146.68%) compared to SCHG (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs BTM's -98.92%.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHG and BTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer