SCHG vs. AVDV
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. SCHG is passively managed, while AVDV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHG returned 14.85%/yr vs 14.16%/yr for AVDV. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.
Performance
SCHG vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 16.37% return.
SCHG
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
AVDV
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 18.24%
- 1Y
- 43.62%
- 3Y*
- 26.98%
- 5Y*
- 14.16%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 5.03% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 10.09% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 16.37% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 11.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and AVDV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between SCHG and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHG vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHG
AVDV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
SCHG
AVDV
Communication Services
SCHG
AVDV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHG
AVDV
Healthcare
SCHG
AVDV
Financial Services
SCHG
AVDV
Industrials
SCHG
AVDV
Consumer Defensive
SCHG
AVDV
Basic Materials
SCHG
AVDV
Energy
SCHG
AVDV
Real Estate
SCHG
AVDV
Utilities
SCHG
AVDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
AVDV
SCHG vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHG | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.48 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 3.32 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | 13.26 | -8.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -43.01% | +8.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -13.19% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -14.17% | -9.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -28.08% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -1.06% | -2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -6.75% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.97% | 3.30% | +1.67% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 5.59%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 6.39% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 13.92% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 16.27% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 17.42% | +4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 19.76% | +1.84% |
SCHG vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHG vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than AVDV's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 4.06% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHG and AVDV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVDV has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to SCHG (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 14.85% vs 14.16% for AVDV. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 14.85% return vs 14.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.06%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.
SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer